Regina/Trafficking

Recruitment Denials · No Identified Recruit · No Washington Travel

Regina’s Trafficking Allegations: Recruitment and Travel Record

Regina denied that either Onision or Lucas asked her to recruit anyone and identified no recruit, instruction, referral, or completed act. Her accounts also place her in Florida, show no visit to Washington, describe little to no contact with Onision, and document repeated pursuit of Lucas despite his distance—materially conflicting with later claims of coordinated trafficking or luring.

Connected evidence: Complete Regina Record · Grooming Allegations · Public Accusations · Claimed Damages · Forum Evidence · Sarah’s Trafficking Claims

November 13, 2019: Regina Denies That Onision or Lucas Ever Asked Her to Recruit Sarah or Anyone Else

When directly asked whether either Onision or Lucas had ever asked her to recruit other young women, Regina answered, “No,” directly contradicting the later recruitment narrative.

During her November 13, 2019 interview, Regina was directly asked whether Onision or Lucas had ever instructed her to recruit other young women.

Regina answered:

“Both of them? No.”

The interviewer then reformulated the question and asked whether Lucas had ever suggested that Regina identify someone from the forums, encourage that person to participate, or send that person to Lucas.

November 13, 2019 interview in which Regina Alonso is asked whether Lucas ever told her to send other people his way, and Regina answers, “No. Not explicitly.

Regina again answered:

“No. Not explicitly.”

What the record directly shows

Regina’s own interview establishes that:

• Regina denied that Onision asked her to recruit young women.
• Regina denied that Lucas asked her to recruit young women.
• The interviewer repeated and reformulated the question after Regina’s first denial.
• Regina still identified no explicit request from Lucas.
• Regina identified no person she was instructed to recruit.
• Regina identified no recruitment message, referral, direction, date, or completed act.
• Regina's complaint against the stranger Onision & Lucas, who rejected Regina, would change the story drastically.

Direct contradiction of the recruitment narrative

The later complaint repeatedly uses terms such as “recruit,” “solicit,” “lure,” and “entice” to portray Onision and Lucas as operating a coordinated system involving young women.

Regina’s own public answer directly rejects the factual premise that either person instructed her to recruit anyone.

When asked about both Onision and Lucas, Regina answered:

“No.”

When the interviewer narrowed and reframed the question specifically around Lucas, Regina still identified no explicit instruction.

A recruitment claim requires an identifiable recruitment act. Regina supplied none.

There was:

• no direction to locate anyone,
• no request to contact anyone,
• no instruction to send anyone,
• no identified recruit,
• and no completed recruitment effort.

Why it matters

The interviewer repeatedly attempted to locate a recruitment instruction within Regina’s communications.

Regina’s answers did not produce one.

Her testimony is especially damaging to the later narrative because the denial came from Regina herself during an interview intended to expose alleged wrongdoing by Onision and Lucas.

Even in that setting, Regina did not claim that either person directed her to recruit young women.

The documented answer is straightforward:

“Both of them? No.”

The follow-up did not repair the accusation. Regina still identified no explicit request from Lucas and no actual recruitment conduct.

Her own account therefore contradicts the effort to portray her as a participant, intermediary, or witness to a coordinated recruitment system involving Onision and Lucas.

Meanwhile, the woman who did recruit other women for Chris Hansen? Regina Alonso. Repeatedly recruited women to help him monetize his YouTube channel and reboot his career according to Vincent Nicotra, Hansen's former assistant.

Source

November 13, 2019 interview of Regina Alonso.

Relevant interview segment: approximately 00:45:01 through 00:46:08.