Regina/Grooming
October 2, 2016: Regina Tells Lucas She Misses Him While Lucas Shows Little Interest
On October 2, 2016, Regina contacted Lucas after watching an Onision video:
- “I saw Greg’s video and I’m just worried abt you and all the bs drama..”
She then told Lucas:
- “And I miss you.”
Lucas did not say that he missed Regina. He replied only:
- “Well we are still together”
Regina continued discussing the public controversy. One week later, she again initiated contact by asking whether Lucas still had a post-office box. Lucas answered:
- “No”
The Contradiction
The exchange shows Regina voluntarily pursuing Lucas after the period she later portrayed as abusive and exploitative.
Regina:
- initiated the conversation
- expressed concern for Lucas
- told him she missed him
- attempted further contact a week later
Lucas did not pursue her, flirt with her, pressure her, or reciprocate her emotional statement. His responses were short and detached.
The contemporaneous record therefore shows Regina treating Lucas as someone she valued and wanted continued access to—not someone she feared or was attempting to escape.
Source
Facebook Messenger exchange dated October 2 and October 9, 2016.
Regina’s messages appear in blue. Lucas’s messages appear in gray.
The screenshot was captured by Regina from her phone and later posted publicly.
Related evidence:
January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Defends Lucas, Calls the Controversy “Ridiculous Drama,” and Identifies a Circulated Screenshot as a Meme
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly responded to allegations involving Lucas and Sarah.
Regina wrote:
- “it’s incredibly ridiculous drama from 3+ yrs ago tht has been addressed previously is being brought up for absolutely no reason.”
She continued:
- “Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions w/o having their lives being dictated by the internet. this needs to stop.”
In a related response, Regina addressed screenshots being circulated as supposed evidence:
- “1. the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
She then stated:
- “2. the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
Regina’s Public Position
Regina did not publicly describe herself as a victim of Lucas or Onision.
Instead, she:
- characterized the controversy as old and previously addressed
- called its renewed circulation “ridiculous drama”
- publicly defended Lucas
- supported Lucas and Sarah’s right to make their own decisions
- rejected internet interference in their lives
- corrected the authorship of one screenshot
- identified another screenshot as a meme
- told the people circulating it to “grow up”
This was Regina speaking publicly in her own words, years after the period later described in the complaint as grooming and
attempted exploitation.
The Later Victim Narrative
The later complaint presents Regina as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and harmed by Lucas and Onision before this tweet was published.
That makes her January 2019 position especially significant.
At the time, Regina did not say:
- Lucas had groomed her
- Onision had conspired in her exploitation
- the old screenshots documented criminal conduct
- the controversy exposed abuse that had happened to her
- Sarah was being drawn into the same predatory system
She said the opposite.
Regina publicly treated the allegations as recycled internet drama, defended Lucas’s autonomy, defended Sarah’s autonomy, and rejected the supposed screenshot evidence.
The Chronological Conflict
The contradiction cannot be explained merely by saying Regina had not yet processed recent events.
According to the complaint’s chronology, the alleged conduct involving Regina had occurred years earlier. By January 2019, Regina was an adult and had substantial distance from the alleged events.
Nevertheless, her public position remained:
- “it’s incredibly ridiculous drama”
and:
- “this needs to stop.”
Regina was therefore not publicly acting as though the screenshots revealed abuse committed against her. She was correcting them, dismissing them, and defending the people she later accused.
Regina Identifies the Evidence as Misrepresented
Regina’s second post is independently important because she distinguishes between two images being circulated:
- One screenshot contained Regina’s own messages, not a conversation between Lucas and Sarah
- The other was, according to Regina, a meme
This shows that Regina believed supposed evidence was being falsely attributed or stripped of context.
The later complaint relies heavily on online messages, screenshots, and interpretations of past communications. Regina’s contemporaneous correction demonstrates that at least some of the material circulated publicly was not what accusers claimed it was.
Her exact response was:
- “the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
and:
- “the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
Regina Later Adopts the Position She Rejected
Regina eventually became a plaintiff alleging that Lucas groomed and exploited her while she was a minor and that Onision participated in the alleged scheme.
That later position is materially inconsistent with her January 2019 public conduct.
In 2019, Regina:
- defended Lucas
- dismissed the controversy
- rejected the evidence being circulated
- insisted the matter had already been addressed
- demanded that outsiders stop interfering
- treated the allegations as unreasonable internet drama
The later complaint transforms the same historical period into the foundation for claims seeking substantial damages.
The public record therefore requires an explanation for when, why, and on what new evidence Regina changed from defending Lucas and rejecting the allegations to presenting herself as one of his victims.
Source
Regina’s public Twitter posts dated January 10, 2019.
Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Exhibit 95.
Related pages:
January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Sends “All My Love” to the People She Later Accused
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly replied to Onision:
- “all my love to them”
The statement appeared during the same public exchange in which Regina:
- called the allegations “incredibly ridiculous drama”
- said the controversy had already been addressed
- defended Lucas and Sarah as adults capable of making their own decisions
- demanded that the public interference stop
- corrected the false attribution of one screenshot
- identified another circulated screenshot as a meme
Regina’s Contemporaneous Position
Regina was not publicly describing the household as a source of fear, trauma, grooming, or exploitation.
Her public position was supportive and affectionate.
She dismissed the accusations and then sent:
- “all my love”
to the people being targeted by them.
This statement is especially significant because the later complaint alleges that Regina had already suffered serious misconduct involving Lucas and Onision years before this post.
Yet in January 2019, Regina was publicly:
- defending Lucas
- rejecting the supposed evidence
- calling the controversy ridiculous
- telling outsiders to stop interfering
- expressing love toward the people involved
The Later Reversal
Regina later adopted a fundamentally different account of the same historical period.
The later complaint portrays her as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and severely harmed before January 2019.
Her contemporaneous public conduct does not reflect that position.
Within the same exchange, Regina moved beyond merely disputing inaccurate screenshots. She publicly expressed affection toward the people she would later accuse.
This should be evaluated alongside her other January 10 statements rather than treated as an isolated phrase.
Together, the posts show that Regina’s expressed position at the time was:
- the controversy was old and ridiculous
- the supposed evidence was being misrepresented
- Lucas and Sarah deserved autonomy
- public interference needed to stop
- the household had her affection and support
Source
Regina’s public Twitter post dated January 10, 2019.
Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye
September 7, 2019: Sarah and Regina Publicly Align Their Accusation Campaigns
On September 7, 2019, Regina publicly aligned herself with Sarah through a message posted under the hashtag:
- #WeStandWithSarah
Regina wrote:
- “I love you. Thank you for being there for me through all the shit you were going through yourself.”
She continued:
- “Im so proud of how far you’ve come.”
Regina concluded:
- “Thank you for showing me what a true friend is.”
Sarah then retweeted Regina’s post, affirmatively distributing Regina’s message to her own audience.
Public Mutual Reinforcement
The post shows Sarah and Regina publicly validating each other during the developing campaign against Onision and Lucas.
Regina presented:
- Sarah as someone who had endured serious hardship
- herself as someone experiencing related hardship
- Sarah as a trusted ally
- their relationship as one of mutual emotional support
- their public narratives as connected
- the campaign around Sarah as something Regina personally endorsed
Sarah’s retweet was not passive association. She deliberately amplified Regina’s statement and displayed their alliance to her own followers.
Regina’s Reversal Since January 2019
The timing creates a major contradiction.
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly defended Lucas and Sarah, writing that the controversy was:
- “incredibly ridiculous drama”
She said the matter had already been addressed and stated:
- “Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions”
Regina also corrected supposed evidence being circulated online:
- “the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
and:
- “the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
She additionally sent:
- “all my love to them”
By September 2019, Regina had reversed course and publicly joined Sarah’s side of the controversy.
The sequence is:
- Regina dismissed the allegations as old and ridiculous
- Regina defended Lucas and Sarah
- Regina rejected screenshots being circulated as evidence
- Regina publicly expressed love toward the people being attacked
- Months later, Regina aligned herself with Sarah’s accusation campaign
- Sarah publicly amplified that alliance
This was not simply Regina learning that Sarah held a different opinion. Regina had previously spoken as someone familiar with the disputed events and had personally corrected the supposed evidence.
Source
Regina’s public Twitter post dated September 7, 2019.
Sarah publicly retweeted the post.
Original accounts:
https://twitter.com/notsolillioness
Archived account captures:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/notsolillioness
Exhibit 121.
Related evidence:
- Regina previously dismisses the allegations and defends Lucas
- Regina previously sends her love to the household
- Sarah: Claimed Harm and Damages
- Sarah: Defamation Claims
September 10, 2019: Rejected & Bitter Regina Admits She Sought Renewed Friendship With Lucas While Lucas Clearly Shows No Interest In Her
On September 10, 2019, Regina publicly admitted that she had actively wanted to restore her friendship with Lucas contradicting her legal complaint where she claims she was some traumatized victim of the same person she is seen here begging to be her friend.
Regina wrote:
“And then I really wanted to be close again”
She further stated that she and Lucas later resumed contact:
“We reconnected as (close) friends about 4/5 mos ago”
Regina attached a private message exchange showing that she was the person seeking renewed friendship. Regina asked Lucas:
“Are we ever gonna be friends like we used to be.”
Lucas responded:
“I'm not sure”
Regina continued:
“Why aren't you sure.”
She then pressed Lucas for a definitive answer:
“All I'm asking is for honesty. I'm not going to be mad regardless of the answer.”
Lucas made no promise of renewed closeness and answered:
“Can't tell the future”
Regina replied:
“Okay.”
What the record directly shows
Regina’s own public post and private messages establish that:
- Regina expressly stated that she “really wanted to be close again.”
- Regina initiated the request to restore her friendship with Lucas.
- Regina asked Lucas whether they would ever be friends as they had been before.
- Lucas did not reciprocate Regina’s desire for renewed closeness.
- Lucas stated that he was unsure about resuming the friendship.
- Lucas refused to promise Regina any future contact or closeness.
- Regina pressed Lucas for a more definitive answer.
- Lucas remained restrained and noncommittal.
- Regina later admitted that she voluntarily reconnected with Lucas as a close friend.
- The desire to restore contact came from Regina, not Lucas.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
Regina's legal complaint alleges that Lucas groomed Regina, caused her to develop romantic feelings, psychologically harmed her, and conspired with Onision to lure and entice her for sexual purposes. Regina’s own post records the opposite communication pattern.
Regina expressly admitted:
“I really wanted to be close again”
The embedded messages show Regina asking Lucas to restore their friendship while Lucas declined to promise that renewed closeness would occur.
The complaint portrays Lucas as the persistent pursuer. Regina’s own evidence shows Lucas distancing himself while Regina attempted to draw him back into regular communication.
Lucas did not:
- ask Regina to become close again,
- encourage her emotional attachment,
- promise future intimacy,
- pressure her to maintain contact,
- or attempt to arrange an in-person meeting.
Instead, Lucas responded:
“I'm not sure”
and:
“Can't tell the future”
Regina’s own evidence therefore directly contradicts the allegation that Lucas was pursuing, controlling, or cultivating her attachment. Regina was seeking renewed access to Lucas while Lucas refused to guarantee that even an ordinary friendship would resume.
Why it matters
Regina’s later accusations require the public to believe that Lucas maintained control over her through grooming, emotional manipulation, and sustained pursuit.
Her own post dismantles that portrayal.
Regina was the person who:
- wanted to become close again,
- initiated the request to restore their friendship,
- pressed Lucas for an answer,
- and later voluntarily reconnected with him.
Lucas was the person who remained uncertain, restrained, and unwilling to promise friendship.
The exchange is especially damaging to Regina’s later narrative because Regina selected and publicly posted the evidence herself. The messages she chose to publish show that Lucas was not pursuing her. They show Regina attempting to restore access to someone who had already distanced himself from her (as Regina herself prior confessed to being a drug addict, and that being part of why she was slowly becoming a rejected and bitter person).
Regina later claimed that she eventually “dropped” Lucas after hearing allegations involving Sarah. That later decision does not alter the chronology Regina herself disclosed: she had previously worked to restore the friendship, successfully reestablished contact, and described herself as having wanted renewed closeness. Her own words place the initiative, desire, and effort with Regina. The documented communication places distance, uncertainty, and restraint with Lucas. The question becomes: Why were you so desperate to integrate yourself into Lucas's life, only to later claim you were some traumatized victim after Lucas rejected you and showed a repeat disinterest in you, a self-admitted drug addict.
Source
September 10, 2019 Twitter post by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.
The post contained a private message exchange between Regina and Lucas. Regina’s messages appear in blue and Lucas’s messages appear in gray.
Consolidated Third Amended Complaint, paragraphs 413–417 and 423–424.
September 20–22, 2019: Regina Ironically Reveals Lucas Rejected Her As A Minor, Then Says He Deserves to Be “Persecuted”
On September 20, 2019, Regina claimed that she had been kicked out of her home in 2015 and informed Lucas about the situation.
Regina wrote:
“I got kicked out of my house in 2015 and when I told Kai all I got was ‘that sucks’.”
According to Regina’s own account, Lucas did not respond by inviting her to Washington, purchasing transportation, offering her housing, encouraging dependency, or attempting to bring her into his household.
Let's be clear, Regina Alonso publicly confessed that when she was a minor, she openly communicated that she, a minor, had no restriction from being transported to Washington by Lucas, and as a result of Regina informing Lucas of this fact, Lucas again, rejected Regina and offered literally no help or transport of any kind.
Regina claims his entire response was:
“that sucks”
Years later, on September 22, 2019, the clearly bitter rejected Regina publicly wrote:
“Kai is a man and deserves to be persecuted like one.”
Regina did not write that Lucas deserved to be prosecuted through lawful proceedings. She wrote that he deserved to be:
“persecuted”
The word Regina deliberately published describes targeted hostility, mistreatment, and punishment. Her own wording exposes the punitive objective of her public campaign against Lucas.
What the record directly shows
Regina’s own public statements establish that:
- Regina claimed that she was removed from her home in Florida in 2015.
- Regina claimed that she informed Lucas about the situation.
- Regina claimed that Lucas responded only, “that sucks.”
- Per Regina's own Ironic confession: Lucas did not use Regina’s claimed housing instability to invite her to Washington.
- Per Regina's own Ironic confession: Lucas did not offer to transport Regina to his household.
- Per Regina's own Ironic confession: Lucas did not offer Regina housing.
- Per Regina's own Ironic confession: Lucas did not attempt to convert the situation into an in-person meeting.
- Per Regina's own Ironic confession: Lucas did not use the claimed crisis to create financial or emotional dependency.
- Regina’s own account portrays Lucas as detached and minimally responsive.
- Years later, Regina publicly stated that Lucas deserved to be “persecuted.”
- Regina openly endorsed punishment and hostility toward Lucas.
- Regina showed no fear or hesitation about publicly attacking Lucas.
- Regina’s conduct was aggressive and punitive, not intimidated or controlled.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
Regina's Complaint alleges that Lucas groomed Regina and conspired with Onision to lure, recruit, solicit, and entice her to travel to their household for sexual activity. Regina’s own account provides a direct test of that allegation.
A claimed housing crisis would have presented an obvious opportunity for someone supposedly determined to lure Regina into his household.
According to Regina herself, Lucas did nothing.
He did not:
- invite her to Washington,
- offer her a place to live,
- arrange transportation,
- offer financial support,
- encourage her to depend upon him,
- introduce sexual communication,
- or attempt to meet her.
Regina claims Lucas responded only:
“that sucks”
That response is incompatible with the complaint’s portrayal of Lucas as actively searching for opportunities to recruit Regina, obtain access to her, or bring her into his household.
Regina’s own description instead shows complete disinterest in using her claimed vulnerability for any purpose.
The September 22 post exposes an additional contradiction.
The complaint portrays Regina as frightened, traumatized, psychologically controlled, and harmed by Lucas. Regina’s public statement shows her confidently declaring that Lucas deserved targeted punishment.
She did not express fear of Lucas.
She demanded his persecution.
Regina’s Own Word Reveals the Purpose of Her Campaign
Regina wrote:
“deserves to be persecuted”
Prosecution refers to a legal process in which evidence is evaluated under established rules.
Persecution describes the intentional targeting and mistreatment of a person.
Regina’s chosen word accurately describes the public campaign she was participating in:
- public insults,
- demands for emotional suffering,
- accusations threatening Lucas’s freedom,
- attacks involving his children,
- reputational destruction,
- deplatforming efforts,
- and financial promotion attached to the campaign.
Regina’s statement was not a demand that evidence be examined fairly.
It was a declaration that Lucas deserved punishment.
Whether Regina understood the distinction or carelessly exposed her actual objective, the published word remains the same:
“persecuted”
Why it matters
These two posts dismantle two central parts of Regina’s later narrative.
First, Regina’s own account shows that Lucas did not exploit her claimed vulnerability.
When Regina allegedly faced homelessness, Lucas did not attempt to transport her, house her, isolate her, recruit her, or bring her anywhere near Onision and Lucas’s household.
Regina claims he said only:
“that sucks”
Second, Regina openly documented her punitive agenda against Lucas.
She publicly stated that he deserved to be “persecuted,” shortly after she had:
- declared that she loved Lucas “always,”
- called him “near and dear,”
- claimed that she wanted to be “close again,”
- pressed him about whether he would ever consider friendship,
- received no promise of future friendship,
- openly celebrated Lucas crying/suffering,
- publicly insulted him,
- and amplified claims that he could be imprisoned or lose his children.
The chronology documents Regina moving from seeking Lucas’s attention to publicly demanding his persecution after Lucas repeatedly failed to give her the response she wanted. This is similar pattern to Sarah in this way, (1) Evil person tries to get with someone (2) Evil person gets rejected (3) Evil person goes on a public smear campaign instead of just accepting they are not desired.
Regina’s own posts show that Lucas did not exploit her claimed vulnerability.
They also show that Regina later joined an organized effort to punish, publicly humiliate, and destroy an innocent person who had repeatedly demonstrated little interest in her.
For understanding, the story compares to the classic cliche of a guy calling a woman a "slut" to everyone he knows because she refused to sleep with them, only reversed, and more deeply malicious due to the involvement of individuals trying to monetize their revenge as a result of being rejected.
Source
September 20 and September 22, 2019 Twitter posts by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.
Consolidated Third Amended Complaint, paragraphs 413–417 and 423–424.
September 22, 2019: Regina Calls It a “Friendship” again, Once Again Contradicting Her Later Dating Narrative
On September 22, 2019, Regina publicly demanded to know whether Lucas had ever cared about what Regina herself described as:
“our friendship”
Regina attached a January 28, 2017 exchange in which she wrote:
“I would still like to be friends whenever you have the time or if you want to.”
Lucas responded only:
“Sure”
What the record directly shows
- Regina called the contact a “friendship.”
- Regina asked Lucas to remain friends.
- Lucas’s entire visible response was “Sure.”
- Regina was the person seeking continued communication and emotional validation.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
The Third Amended Complaint alleges that Lucas caused Regina to develop romantic feelings, called her his “girlfriend,” and cultivated a romantic connection for sexual purposes.
Regina’s own public wording contradicts that narrative.
She did not describe dating.
She wrote:
“our friendship”
Her attached evidence likewise shows Regina requesting friendship, not documenting a romantic connection. Lucas did not confirm Regina’s characterization, much less claim that they were dating. He responded only:
“Sure”
Regina repeatedly shifted between calling the contact a friendship and later presenting it as romantic when that characterization became useful to her accusations. Her own words expose the inconsistency.
Why it matters
Regina’s use of the word “friendship” is a revealing admission.
The later narrative asks the public to believe that Lucas treated Regina as a girlfriend and cultivated a romantic attachment. Regina’s own post instead shows:
- Regina calling it a friendship,
- Regina requesting continued friendship,
- Regina questioning whether Lucas ever cared about that friendship,
- and Lucas providing no romantic statement whatsoever.
The contradiction is direct.
Regina cannot honestly characterize the same contact as an ordinary friendship when seeking Lucas’s attention, then transform it into a dating or romantic arrangement when pursuing accusations against him.
Her own evidence shows Regina seeking friendship from Lucas while Lucas remained minimally responsive.
Source
September 22, 2019 Twitter post by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye, containing a January 28, 2017 message exchange with Lucas.
Regina’s messages appear in blue. Lucas’s response appears in gray.
Consolidated Third Amended Complaint, paragraphs 413 and 423–424.
November 13, 2019: Regina Admits She Had “Little to No Contact” With Onision and Really Only Communicated With Lucas
During a November 13, 2019 interview, Regina admitted that she was effectively a stranger to Onision.
Regina stated:
“I had little to no contact with Greg. It was very very scarce, it was with Kai.”
Using the names applied throughout this archive, Regina admitted that she had “little to no contact” with Onision and that her communications were with Lucas.
What the record directly shows
Regina’s own statement establishes that:
- Regina had “little to no contact” with Onision.
- Any contact with Onision was, according to Regina, “very very scarce.” (this almost falls in perfect alignment with Onision describing Regina as an irrelevant stranger to him)
- Regina identified Lucas as the person with whom she communicated.
- Regina did not specifically describe any communication with Onision.
- Regina’s own account places Onision outside the alleged personal communications she later attempted to attribute jointly to both defendants in her frivolous lawsuit, actively harming a man she didn't even know and another person who outright rejected her.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
Regina’s Complaint alleges that Lucas conspired with Onision to groom, recruit, solicit, lure, and entice her for sexual purposes.
Regina’s own interview strips Onision of the direct personal role assigned to him in that narrative.
She admitted:
“I had little to no contact with Greg.”
She then clarified:
“it was with Kai.”
The complaint attempts to convert communications Regina attributes to Lucas into a coordinated personal grooming venture involving Onision, despite Regina’s own admission that Onision had little to no contact with her.
This contradiction is especially severe when combined with Regina’s separate admissions that she never visited their home, was rejected when she informed Lucas she was available to fly up and described her communications as being primarily with Lucas, the same person who rejected her.
Why it matters
Regina’s claims against Onision depend on inserting him into communications and conduct that Regina herself attributed solely with Lucas. Regina nevertheless later joined a legal and public campaign portraying Onision as a central participant in personally grooming and recruiting her when he doesn't even know her. To Onision, Regina remains just some random internet creep who, like many, wished death on him publicly, despite never even knowing him.
Her interview exposes the gap between her firsthand experience and the allegations later asserted in her name.
Onision cannot honestly be portrayed as anything significant to someone who admits that she had “little to no contact” with him.
Source
November 13, 2019 interview of Regina Alonso.
Relevant interview segment: approximately 00:08:20 through 00:08:57.
Consolidated Third Amended Complaint, paragraphs 413–417 and 423–424.
November 13, 2019: Regina Describes Lucas as Uninvolved During Her Age-17 Housing Crisis, Undermining the Claimed Luring Scheme
During her November 13, 2019 interview, Regina described being kicked out of her home at age 17.
Regina stated:
“I wanna tell myself that when you're 17 and you get kicked out of your house and you're standing in the middle of the road crying not knowing where you're gonna go next, Kai's not gonna care.”
Regina’s statement portrays Lucas as detached and unwilling to intervene during the exact type of vulnerability her later Complaint claims he intended to exploit. This also matches Regina’s separate September 20, 2019 admission that she told Lucas she had been kicked out and allegedly received only the response:
“that sucks”
What the record directly shows
Regina’s own statements establish that:
- Regina described experiencing a housing crisis at age 17.
- Regina claimed Lucas knew she had been kicked out.
- Regina portrayed Lucas as unwilling to intervene.
- Regina separately claimed that Lucas responded only, “that sucks.”
- Lucas did not use the crisis to invite Regina to Washington.
- Lucas did not offer Regina housing.
- Lucas did not arrange transportation.
- Lucas did not use the situation to create dependency.
- Lucas did not convert Regina’s claimed vulnerability into an in-person meeting.
- Regina’s own account portrays disinterest and distance from Lucas, not pursuit.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
Regina’s Complaint alleges that Lucas conspired with Onision to lure, recruit, solicit, and entice her to travel to their household for sexual activity.
Regina’s own account, once again, supplies the opposite conduct.
A housing crisis involving a 17-year-old would have presented an obvious opportunity for anyone supposedly attempting to transport Regina to Washington and obtain control over her.
According to Regina herself, Lucas did nothing.
She claims he responded only:
“that sucks”
Regina then repeated in her interview that Lucas was:
“not gonna care”
Her own statements show no invitation, no transportation offer, no housing offer, no financial inducement, no recruitment, and no attempt to bring her anywhere near Onision or Lucas.
Why it matters
Regina’s later theory depends on portraying Lucas as actively searching for opportunities to exploit her vulnerability.
Her own description of the most obvious alleged opportunity destroys that portrayal.
When Regina claimed she was 17, displaced, and uncertain where she would live, Lucas allegedly offered no assistance and made no attempt to bring her to Washington.
Regina cannot logically maintain that Lucas was determined to lure her into his household while simultaneously admitting that he declined to act when she was allegedly available, vulnerable, and without housing.
The documented pattern is consistent:
- Regina sought Lucas’s attention.
- Regina attempted to maintain communication.
- Regina claimed she wanted to be “close again.”
- Lucas repeatedly showed minimal interest.
- Regina’s claimed housing crisis did not cause Lucas to pursue her.
- Regina later transformed Lucas’s repeated detachment into an allegation that he had been attempting to lure and exploit her.
Her own admissions contradict that accusation.
Source
November 13, 2019 interview of Regina Alonso.
Relevant interview segment: approximately 00:42:10 through 00:42:55.
September 20, 2019 Twitter post by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.
Consolidated Third Amended Complaint, paragraphs 413–417 and 423–424.