Regina/Defamation
September 9, 2019: Regina Admits She Publicly Posted “Half Nudes” on a Daily Basis
On September 9, 2019, Regina publicly acknowledged that she had regularly posted partially nude images (whatever that means) on her former Twitter account during the same general period addressed by her later allegations against Lucas.
Regina wrote:
“I mean I was also publicly posting half nudes on my old twitter at the time on the daily as well”
She added that she believed a friend should have intervened:
“but a good friend would've slapped some sense into me I feel like”
What the record directly shows
Regina’s statement establishes that her distribution of intimate or partially nude images was public, not necessarily relevant to Lucas whom denies any inappropriate interaction with Regina, who is 3 years younger than Lucas.
Her admission shows that:
- Regina independently posted “half nudes” to her own public Twitter account.
- She described the posting as occurring “on the daily.”
- The images were made available to a public online audience.
- Regina exercised independent control over the creation and public distribution of similar material.
- Regina’s own statement places her public posting conduct within the relevant period.
Direct contradiction of the lawsuit's "Third Amended Complaint"
The Third Amended Complaint alleges that Lucas groomed Regina, allegedly requested images from her, and allegedly received those "half nude" images (Which are what? A swim suit selfie from the 3 year junior? What? Judge Chun already dismissed Regina's claim there on the basis that even her claim was irrelevant to the proceedings.) as part of an attempted "trafficking" and "enticement" scheme.
Regina’s own public statement materially contradicts the complaint’s portrayal of her image-sharing behavior as conduct uniquely created, directed, or caused by Lucas, whom again, claims no such inappropriate interaction even occured.
The contemporaneous record instead shows that Regina was independently and repeatedly posting similar images to the public at large through her own account.
Her admission does not support the theory that Lucas introduced her to this conduct or exercised exclusive control over it. It shows that Regina was already choosing to create and distribute such images publicly, without any demonstrated request or direction from Lucas.
Why it matters
Regina’s later narrative depends on presenting Lucas as the person responsible for causing or inducing her to create and distribute intimate images.
This admission undermines that narrative.
Regina expressly stated that she was publicly posting “half nudes” every day. That conduct was broader than any alleged private exchange with Lucas and was directed toward the entire online public. For full disclosure, Regina Alonso later started a Chaturbate account, a site designed for individuals to masturbate live for the public internet audience. Lucas by contrast, has shown no interest in such behaviors that Regina actively engaged in.
The evidence therefore demonstrates:
- independent image creation,
- independent public distribution,
- repeated conduct rather than an isolated private exchange,
- and a preexisting pattern not shown to have been controlled by Lucas.
The screenshot directly undermines the complaint’s attempt to portray her image-sharing conduct as something created exclusively through
Lucas’s alleged grooming or solicitation of the woman whose age is 3 years different than Lucas.
Regina’s own admission shows that she was independently engaging in the same general category of conduct in public, on a recurring basis, and through an account she controlled. If Regina's confession here is of something illegal, it means Regina publicly confessed to being a criminal (person who committed crimes) independent of anything involving anyone else.
Source
September 9, 2019 Twitter post by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.
The screenshot was preserved from Regina’s public Twitter activity and later included as Exhibit 164 in the defendants’ evidentiary submission.
September 9, 2019: Regina Confessed Being a Drug Addict & Admits She Never Visited Onision or Lucas and Fell Out With Lucas
On September 9, 2019, Regina publicly admitted that she never visited Onision or Lucas and never was near them or their household.
Regina wrote:
“I was never at their house”
She described herself as having been primarily friends with Lucas beginning in 2012:
“I was just close friends w kai mainly starting in 2012.”
Regina then confirmed that the relationship ended before she was ever able to visit:
“Kai and I had a falling out before I was even able to visit due to me battling addiction”
What the record directly shows
Regina’s own statement establishes that:
- Regina never visited Onision or Lucas.
- Regina was never present anywhere near them or their household.
- Regina never met them despite her later allegations.
- Her friendship was with Lucas, not Onision.
- Regina and Lucas had a falling out before any visit occurred.
- Lucas did not continue the connection through an in-person meeting.
- Regina attributed the falling out to circumstances involving her own battle with addiction. (she is or was a drug addict, per her own admission)
- The alleged relationship ended without Regina ever traveling to meet Onision or Lucas.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
The Third Amended Complaint alleges that Lucas groomed Regina, caused her to develop romantic feelings, and conspired with Onision to lure, recruit, solicit, and entice her to travel to their home for sexual activity. Regina’s own public admission confirms that she never visited their home and that her friendship with Lucas ended before any meeting occurred.
The complaint portrays Onision and Lucas as aggressively pursuing Regina toward an in-person sexual encounter. Regina’s statement records the opposite outcome: Lucas ended the connection due to Regina being a drug addict before Regina could visit.
This is particularly damaging to the allegation that Onision and Lucas were operating together to obtain sexual access to Regina. Regina never met either of them, never entered their household, never even got anywhere near them, and identifies the relationship as primarily involving Lucas. Her own chronology supplies no completed meeting, no physical contact, no household access, and no continuing effort by Lucas to bring her into their home.
Why it matters
Regina’s later allegations depend on portraying herself as the target of a sustained joint effort by Onision and Lucas to lure her into their household for sexual purposes. Her own statement dismantles that portrayal.
Regina admits:
- she was never at their house,
- she never completed a visit,
- she really only communicated with Lucas,
- and Lucas ended the relationship before an in-person meeting ever occurred.
A person supposedly determined to lure Regina into his household for sex would not end the relationship before she could visit. Lucas’s decision to disengage is incompatible with the complaint’s theory that he was pursuing an ongoing trafficking or enticement objective.
Regina’s admission also removes Onision from the alleged interpersonal relationship. She described herself as primarily close with Lucas and confirmed that she never visited either person. The complaint nevertheless attempts to transform a terminated online friendship between people only three years apart in age into a coordinated trafficking venture involving Onision who had no interest in Regina. Onision described Regina, the one time he saw her avatar as a word synonymous with "Hideous" and compared her to Squidward from Sponge-Bob.
The contemporaneous public record instead shows that Regina never met Onision or Lucas and that Lucas rejected further involvement before any proposed visit occurred, according to Regina, due to her being a literal drug addict.
Source
September 9, 2019 Twitter post by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.
The screenshot was preserved from Regina’s public Twitter activity and later included as Exhibit 166 in the defendants’ evidentiary submission.