Maya
December 28, 2017: Maya Accepts Responsibility, Asks to Return, and Is Rejected by Onision and Lucas
A time-stamped message exchange from December 27–28, 2017 documents the end of Maya’s involvement with Onision and Lucas.
The chronology is significant: Maya accepted responsibility for the conflict, praised Onision’s attempts to understand her, expressed romantic feelings toward both Onision and Lucas, requested another opportunity, and was firmly rejected.
Maya Apologizes and Accepts Responsibility
At 7:47 a.m. on December 28, Maya sent Onision an extensive apology:
- “I’m really sorry for leaving on a bad note”
She admitted that her conduct had been driven by anxiety rather than misconduct by Onision:
- “I acted impulsively and irrationally”
Maya acknowledged that she avoided communication and escalated the conflict unnecessarily:
- “all we needed to do was talk it out”
- “There was a lot of miscommunication which led to a lot of misunderstanding.”
She repeatedly described her own conduct as wrong:
- “I became anxious and i would say things impulsively”
- “i didn’t know how to deal with the situation at the moment which was really wrong of me.”
- “I decided not to communicate how i felt”
- “That was really wrong of me.”
These were contemporaneous admissions made privately, before any later public campaign or incentive to portray the relationship differently.
Maya Says Onision Was Trying to Understand Her
Maya expressly credited Onision with attempting to understand and accommodate her:
- “I understand now that you were trying to understand where i was coming from”
She added:
- “I see now that you were willing to try to understand how i deal with situations to know how to handle them”
Maya explained that she initially misinterpreted those efforts because of prior experiences with other people:
- “i perceived it as you trying to dig too deep and mess with me which triggered from past experiences”
Her account therefore placed the misunderstanding primarily in her own perception and prior trauma—not in an intention by Onision to manipulate or harm her.
Maya Thanks Onision and Describes a Positive Experience
Maya wrote:
- “I’m really grateful for all you did for me”
She also stated that proper communication could have allowed the relationship to succeed:
- “I think proper communication would have helped”
Maya did not describe herself as attempting to escape Onision or Lucas. She described herself as regretting her departure and wanting another opportunity to become part of their lives.
Maya Admits Feelings for Onision and Lucas
Maya wrote:
- “I really did start having feelings for you and lainey and I can’t lie about that”
The reference to “lainey” is a former name used by Lucas at the time of the exchange.
Maya continued:
- “i really do care about you and your family.”
She described seeing long-term potential:
- “I really did see potential as i saw how well we could all work together as a team.”
She then asked to return:
- “If you’re willing to i would like to try again on a better note”
The direction of pursuit is clear. Maya was asking Onision and Lucas to reconsider ending the relationship.
Onision Rejects Maya and Permanently Ends Contact
At 9:22 a.m.—less than two hours after Maya’s apology—Onision responded:
- “I hope you have a great life Maya.”
He then imposed an unequivocal no-contact boundary:
- “This will be the last you hear from me”
Onision explained that the decision was shared by both him and Lucas:
- “both Lainey & I are not willing to continue going through what we did emotionally when you were around.”
He described Maya’s conduct as persistently disruptive:
- “The things you did and said were regularly confusing, upsetting”
Onision stated that the household was happier after Maya left:
- “we are happier now that things are peaceful once again.”
He concluded:
- “Again, please have a great life. Goodbye.”
This was not an invitation to continue the relationship. It was a final rejection delivered after Maya apologized and asked for another chance.
Credibility Significance
The exchange establishes the contemporaneous baseline against which Maya’s later public statements must be evaluated.
Before any later hostile account, Maya privately stated that:
- she acted impulsively and irrationally
- she avoided necessary communication
- she repeatedly misunderstood the situation
- Onision was trying to understand her
- her reactions were affected by anxiety and prior experiences
- she was grateful for what Onision had done
- she developed feelings for Onision and Lucas
- she cared about their family
- she believed they could function as a team
- she wanted another opportunity
- Onision and Lucas rejected her request
- Onision permanently ended contact
A later account that presents Maya only as someone rejected after recognizing wrongdoing by Onision would omit the central facts documented in her own message.
She did not leave while condemning Onision. She apologized, praised his efforts, sought renewed involvement, and was refused.
The Recurring Rejection-and-Reversal Pattern
The Maya exchange resembles other preserved records involving former associates of Onision and Lucas:
- The individual makes favorable statements about Onision.
- The individual apologizes or accepts responsibility for misconduct.
- The individual seeks forgiveness, renewed contact, or continued involvement.
- Onision rejects the request or imposes a no-contact boundary.
- The individual later promotes a materially more hostile public account.
- The original messages are omitted until Onision publishes them.
The legally important issue is not the gender of the participants. It is the repeated presence of:
- prior inconsistent statements
- contemporaneous admissions against personal interest
- motive arising after rejection
- omitted relationship context
- reversals occurring after access was terminated
- public narratives contradicted by preserved private communications
These factors are directly relevant to credibility, bias, motive, memory, and the reliability of later accusations.
What the Evidence Establishes
The December 28, 2017 exchange establishes that:
- Maya apologized to Onision.
- Maya called her own behavior impulsive and irrational.
- Maya repeatedly admitted that she communicated poorly.
- Maya said Onision had tried to understand her.
- Maya attributed her reactions partly to anxiety and prior experiences.
- Maya thanked Onision for what he had done for her.
- Maya admitted feelings for Onision and Lucas.
- Maya said she cared about their family.
- Maya asked for another opportunity.
- Onision rejected that request.
- Onision stated that Lucas agreed with ending contact.
- Onision said the household was happier and more peaceful without Maya.
- Onision permanently ended the relationship.
- Maya was seeking continued involvement; Onision was refusing it.
- Later hostile statements must be evaluated against Maya’s original admissions and the motive created by rejection.
The messages undermine any later narrative that conceals Maya’s apology, attraction, request to return, or Onision’s decision to terminate contact.
Source
- Private text exchange between Maya and Onision.
- Preliminary messages dated December 27, 2017 at 1:09 p.m.
- Maya’s apology dated December 28, 2017 at 7:47 a.m.
- Onision’s final response dated December 28, 2017 at 9:22 a.m.
- Complete composite screenshot preserved by Onision.
- The name “Lainey” appears only because it was the name Lucas used at the time and is preserved inside the original quotation.
Onision and Lucas Overview · Chris Hansen Record · Damage to Onision and Lucas