Jump to content

Regina/Grooming

From Onision Wiki
Revision as of 22:20, 15 July 2026 by Admin (talk | contribs)

Chronological Evidence Review

Regina: Grooming Allegations

Regina’s later grooming and exploitation claims compared with her unsolicited contact, affection toward Lucas, repeated efforts to remain connected, public defenses of Lucas, and contemporaneous statements from the relevant period.

October 2, 2016: Regina Tells Lucas She Misses Him While Lucas Shows Little Interest

October 2016 Facebook messages in which Regina tells Lucas she misses him while Lucas responds briefly without returning the sentiment.
Regina initiated contact, expressed concern for Lucas, and told him she missed him. Lucas did not reciprocate the affection and responded with brief, detached messages.

On October 2, 2016, Regina contacted Lucas after watching an Onision video:

“I saw Greg’s video and I’m just worried abt you and all the bs drama..”

She then told Lucas:

“And I miss you.”

Lucas did not say that he missed Regina. He replied only:

“Well we are still together”

Regina continued discussing the public controversy. One week later, she again initiated contact by asking whether Lucas still had a post-office box. Lucas answered:

“No”

The Contradiction

The exchange shows Regina voluntarily pursuing Lucas after the period she later portrayed as abusive and exploitative.

Regina:

  • initiated the conversation
  • expressed concern for Lucas
  • told him she missed him
  • attempted further contact a week later

Lucas did not pursue her, flirt with her, pressure her, or reciprocate her emotional statement. His responses were short and detached.

The contemporaneous record therefore shows Regina treating Lucas as someone she valued and wanted continued access to—not someone she feared or was attempting to escape.

Source

Facebook Messenger exchange dated October 2 and October 9, 2016.

Regina’s messages appear in blue. Lucas’s messages appear in gray.

The screenshot was captured by Regina from her phone and later posted publicly.

Related evidence:

January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Defends Lucas, Calls the Controversy “Ridiculous Drama,” and Identifies a Circulated Screenshot as a Meme

January 10, 2019 tweets in which Regina defends Lucas and Sarah, calls the controversy old ridiculous drama, and states that one circulated screenshot was a meme.
Regina publicly described the allegations as “ridiculous drama” that had already been addressed, defended Lucas and Sarah as adults capable of making their own decisions, and identified one circulated screenshot as a meme.

On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly responded to allegations involving Lucas and Sarah.

Regina wrote:

“it’s incredibly ridiculous drama from 3+ yrs ago tht has been addressed previously is being brought up for absolutely no reason.”

She continued:

“Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions w/o having their lives being dictated by the internet. this needs to stop.”

In a related response, Regina addressed screenshots being circulated as supposed evidence:

“1. the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”

She then stated:

“2. the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”

Regina’s Public Position

Regina did not publicly describe herself as a victim of Lucas or Onision.

Instead, she:

  • characterized the controversy as old and previously addressed
  • called its renewed circulation “ridiculous drama”
  • publicly defended Lucas
  • supported Lucas and Sarah’s right to make their own decisions
  • rejected internet interference in their lives
  • corrected the authorship of one screenshot
  • identified another screenshot as a meme
  • told the people circulating it to “grow up”

This was Regina speaking publicly in her own words, years after the period later described in the complaint as grooming and

January 10, 2019 tweet in which Regina states that Lucas was never Sarah’s guardian and questions why his personal choices would affect the person being addressed.
Regina stated that Lucas “was never” Sarah’s guardian and publicly defended him after the period in which Regina later alleged that he had victimized her.

attempted exploitation.

The Later Victim Narrative

The later complaint presents Regina as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and harmed by Lucas and Onision before this tweet was published.

That makes her January 2019 position especially significant.

At the time, Regina did not say:

  • Lucas had groomed her
  • Onision had conspired in her exploitation
  • the old screenshots documented criminal conduct
  • the controversy exposed abuse that had happened to her
  • Sarah was being drawn into the same predatory system

She said the opposite.

Regina publicly treated the allegations as recycled internet drama, defended Lucas’s autonomy, defended Sarah’s autonomy, and rejected the supposed screenshot evidence.

The Chronological Conflict

The contradiction cannot be explained merely by saying Regina had not yet processed recent events.

According to the complaint’s chronology, the alleged conduct involving Regina had occurred years earlier. By January 2019, Regina was an adult and had substantial distance from the alleged events.

Nevertheless, her public position remained:

“it’s incredibly ridiculous drama”

and:

“this needs to stop.”

Regina was therefore not publicly acting as though the screenshots revealed abuse committed against her. She was correcting them, dismissing them, and defending the people she later accused.

Regina Identifies the Evidence as Misrepresented

Regina’s second post is independently important because she distinguishes between two images being circulated:

  1. One screenshot contained Regina’s own messages, not a conversation between Lucas and Sarah
  2. The other was, according to Regina, a meme

This shows that Regina believed supposed evidence was being falsely attributed or stripped of context.

The later complaint relies heavily on online messages, screenshots, and interpretations of past communications. Regina’s contemporaneous correction demonstrates that at least some of the material circulated publicly was not what accusers claimed it was.

Her exact response was:

“the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”

and:

“the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”

Regina Later Adopts the Position She Rejected

Regina eventually became a plaintiff alleging that Lucas groomed and exploited her while she was a minor and that Onision participated in the alleged scheme.

That later position is materially inconsistent with her January 2019 public conduct.

In 2019, Regina:

  • defended Lucas
  • dismissed the controversy
  • rejected the evidence being circulated
  • insisted the matter had already been addressed
  • demanded that outsiders stop interfering
  • treated the allegations as unreasonable internet drama

The later complaint transforms the same historical period into the foundation for claims seeking substantial damages.

The public record therefore requires an explanation for when, why, and on what new evidence Regina changed from defending Lucas and rejecting the allegations to presenting herself as one of his victims.

Source

Regina’s public Twitter posts dated January 10, 2019.

Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye

Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye

Exhibit 95.

Related pages:

January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Sends “All My Love” to the People She Later Accused

January 10, 2019 tweet in which Regina replies to Onision and writes all my love to them.
While publicly defending Lucas and dismissing the controversy as old “ridiculous drama,” Regina replied to Onision: “all my love to them.”

On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly replied to Onision:

“all my love to them”

The statement appeared during the same public exchange in which Regina:

  • called the allegations “incredibly ridiculous drama”
  • said the controversy had already been addressed
  • defended Lucas and Sarah as adults capable of making their own decisions
  • demanded that the public interference stop
  • corrected the false attribution of one screenshot
  • identified another circulated screenshot as a meme

Regina’s Contemporaneous Position

Regina was not publicly describing the household as a source of fear, trauma, grooming, or exploitation.

Her public position was supportive and affectionate.

She dismissed the accusations and then sent:

“all my love”

to the people being targeted by them.

This statement is especially significant because the later complaint alleges that Regina had already suffered serious misconduct involving Lucas and Onision years before this post.

Yet in January 2019, Regina was publicly:

  • defending Lucas
  • rejecting the supposed evidence
  • calling the controversy ridiculous
  • telling outsiders to stop interfering
  • expressing love toward the people involved

The Later Reversal

Regina later adopted a fundamentally different account of the same historical period.

The later complaint portrays her as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and severely harmed before January 2019.

Her contemporaneous public conduct does not reflect that position.

Within the same exchange, Regina moved beyond merely disputing inaccurate screenshots. She publicly expressed affection toward the people she would later accuse.

This should be evaluated alongside her other January 10 statements rather than treated as an isolated phrase.

Together, the posts show that Regina’s expressed position at the time was:

  • the controversy was old and ridiculous
  • the supposed evidence was being misrepresented
  • Lucas and Sarah deserved autonomy
  • public interference needed to stop
  • the household had her affection and support

Source

Regina’s public Twitter post dated January 10, 2019.

Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye

Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye

September 7, 2019: Sarah and Regina Publicly Align Their Accusation Campaigns

On September 7, 2019, Regina publicly aligned herself with Sarah through a message posted under the hashtag:

#WeStandWithSarah

Regina wrote:

“I love you. Thank you for being there for me through all the shit you were going through yourself.”

She continued:

“Im so proud of how far you’ve come.”

Regina concluded:

“Thank you for showing me what a true friend is.”

Sarah then retweeted Regina’s post, affirmatively distributing Regina’s message to her own audience.

Public Mutual Reinforcement

The post shows Sarah and Regina publicly validating each other during the developing campaign against Onision and Lucas.

Regina presented:

  • Sarah as someone who had endured serious hardship
  • herself as someone experiencing related hardship
  • Sarah as a trusted ally
  • their relationship as one of mutual emotional support
  • their public narratives as connected
  • the campaign around Sarah as something Regina personally endorsed

Sarah’s retweet was not passive association. She deliberately amplified Regina’s statement and displayed their alliance to her own followers.

Regina’s Reversal Since January 2019

The timing creates a major contradiction.

On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly defended Lucas and Sarah, writing that the controversy was:

“incredibly ridiculous drama”

She said the matter had already been addressed and stated:

“Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions”

Regina also corrected supposed evidence being circulated online:

“the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”

and:

“the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”

She additionally sent:

“all my love to them”

By September 2019, Regina had reversed course and publicly joined Sarah’s side of the controversy.

The sequence is:

  1. Regina dismissed the allegations as old and ridiculous
  2. Regina defended Lucas and Sarah
  3. Regina rejected screenshots being circulated as evidence
  4. Regina publicly expressed love toward the people being attacked
  5. Months later, Regina aligned herself with Sarah’s accusation campaign
  6. Sarah publicly amplified that alliance

This was not simply Regina learning that Sarah held a different opinion. Regina had previously spoken as someone familiar with the disputed events and had personally corrected the supposed evidence.

Source

Regina’s public Twitter post dated September 7, 2019.

Sarah publicly retweeted the post.

Original accounts:

https://twitter.com/hahan0bye

https://twitter.com/notsolillioness

Archived account captures:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/hahan0bye

https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/notsolillioness

Exhibit 121.

Related evidence: