Regina/Grooming
Chronological Evidence Review
Regina: Grooming Allegations
Regina’s later grooming and exploitation claims compared with her unsolicited contact, affection toward Lucas, repeated efforts to remain connected, public defenses of Lucas, and contemporaneous statements from the relevant period.
Related: Damages · Complete Record · Forum Allegations · Sarah’s Grooming Claims
October 2, 2016: Regina Tells Lucas She Misses Him While Lucas Shows Little Interest
On October 2, 2016, Regina contacted Lucas after watching an Onision video:
- “I saw Greg’s video and I’m just worried abt you and all the bs drama..”
She then told Lucas:
- “And I miss you.”
Lucas did not say that he missed Regina. He replied only:
- “Well we are still together”
Regina continued discussing the public controversy. One week later, she again initiated contact by asking whether Lucas still had a post-office box. Lucas answered:
- “No”
The Contradiction
The exchange shows Regina voluntarily pursuing Lucas after the period she later portrayed as abusive and exploitative.
Regina:
- initiated the conversation
- expressed concern for Lucas
- told him she missed him
- attempted further contact a week later
Lucas did not pursue her, flirt with her, pressure her, or reciprocate her emotional statement. His responses were short and detached.
The contemporaneous record therefore shows Regina treating Lucas as someone she valued and wanted continued access to—not someone she feared or was attempting to escape.
Source
Facebook Messenger exchange dated October 2 and October 9, 2016.
Regina’s messages appear in blue. Lucas’s messages appear in gray.
The screenshot was captured by Regina from her phone and later posted publicly.
Related evidence:
January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Defends Lucas, Calls the Controversy “Ridiculous Drama,” and Identifies a Circulated Screenshot as a Meme
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly responded to allegations involving Lucas and Sarah.
Regina wrote:
- “it’s incredibly ridiculous drama from 3+ yrs ago tht has been addressed previously is being brought up for absolutely no reason.”
She continued:
- “Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions w/o having their lives being dictated by the internet. this needs to stop.”
In a related response, Regina addressed screenshots being circulated as supposed evidence:
- “1. the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
She then stated:
- “2. the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
Regina’s Public Position
Regina did not publicly describe herself as a victim of Lucas or Onision.
Instead, she:
- characterized the controversy as old and previously addressed
- called its renewed circulation “ridiculous drama”
- publicly defended Lucas
- supported Lucas and Sarah’s right to make their own decisions
- rejected internet interference in their lives
- corrected the authorship of one screenshot
- identified another screenshot as a meme
- told the people circulating it to “grow up”
This was Regina speaking publicly in her own words, years after the period later described in the complaint as grooming and
attempted exploitation.
The Later Victim Narrative
The later complaint presents Regina as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and harmed by Lucas and Onision before this tweet was published.
That makes her January 2019 position especially significant.
At the time, Regina did not say:
- Lucas had groomed her
- Onision had conspired in her exploitation
- the old screenshots documented criminal conduct
- the controversy exposed abuse that had happened to her
- Sarah was being drawn into the same predatory system
She said the opposite.
Regina publicly treated the allegations as recycled internet drama, defended Lucas’s autonomy, defended Sarah’s autonomy, and rejected the supposed screenshot evidence.
The Chronological Conflict
The contradiction cannot be explained merely by saying Regina had not yet processed recent events.
According to the complaint’s chronology, the alleged conduct involving Regina had occurred years earlier. By January 2019, Regina was an adult and had substantial distance from the alleged events.
Nevertheless, her public position remained:
- “it’s incredibly ridiculous drama”
and:
- “this needs to stop.”
Regina was therefore not publicly acting as though the screenshots revealed abuse committed against her. She was correcting them, dismissing them, and defending the people she later accused.
Regina Identifies the Evidence as Misrepresented
Regina’s second post is independently important because she distinguishes between two images being circulated:
- One screenshot contained Regina’s own messages, not a conversation between Lucas and Sarah
- The other was, according to Regina, a meme
This shows that Regina believed supposed evidence was being falsely attributed or stripped of context.
The later complaint relies heavily on online messages, screenshots, and interpretations of past communications. Regina’s contemporaneous correction demonstrates that at least some of the material circulated publicly was not what accusers claimed it was.
Her exact response was:
- “the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
and:
- “the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
Regina Later Adopts the Position She Rejected
Regina eventually became a plaintiff alleging that Lucas groomed and exploited her while she was a minor and that Onision participated in the alleged scheme.
That later position is materially inconsistent with her January 2019 public conduct.
In 2019, Regina:
- defended Lucas
- dismissed the controversy
- rejected the evidence being circulated
- insisted the matter had already been addressed
- demanded that outsiders stop interfering
- treated the allegations as unreasonable internet drama
The later complaint transforms the same historical period into the foundation for claims seeking substantial damages.
The public record therefore requires an explanation for when, why, and on what new evidence Regina changed from defending Lucas and rejecting the allegations to presenting herself as one of his victims.
Source
Regina’s public Twitter posts dated January 10, 2019.
Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Exhibit 95.
Related pages:
January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Sends “All My Love” to the People She Later Accused
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly replied to Onision:
- “all my love to them”
The statement appeared during the same public exchange in which Regina:
- called the allegations “incredibly ridiculous drama”
- said the controversy had already been addressed
- defended Lucas and Sarah as adults capable of making their own decisions
- demanded that the public interference stop
- corrected the false attribution of one screenshot
- identified another circulated screenshot as a meme
Regina’s Contemporaneous Position
Regina was not publicly describing the household as a source of fear, trauma, grooming, or exploitation.
Her public position was supportive and affectionate.
She dismissed the accusations and then sent:
- “all my love”
to the people being targeted by them.
This statement is especially significant because the later complaint alleges that Regina had already suffered serious misconduct involving Lucas and Onision years before this post.
Yet in January 2019, Regina was publicly:
- defending Lucas
- rejecting the supposed evidence
- calling the controversy ridiculous
- telling outsiders to stop interfering
- expressing love toward the people involved
The Later Reversal
Regina later adopted a fundamentally different account of the same historical period.
The later complaint portrays her as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and severely harmed before January 2019.
Her contemporaneous public conduct does not reflect that position.
Within the same exchange, Regina moved beyond merely disputing inaccurate screenshots. She publicly expressed affection toward the people she would later accuse.
This should be evaluated alongside her other January 10 statements rather than treated as an isolated phrase.
Together, the posts show that Regina’s expressed position at the time was:
- the controversy was old and ridiculous
- the supposed evidence was being misrepresented
- Lucas and Sarah deserved autonomy
- public interference needed to stop
- the household had her affection and support
Source
Regina’s public Twitter post dated January 10, 2019.
Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye
September 7, 2019: Sarah and Regina Publicly Align Their Accusation Campaigns
On September 7, 2019, Regina publicly aligned herself with Sarah through a message posted under the hashtag:
- #WeStandWithSarah
Regina wrote:
- “I love you. Thank you for being there for me through all the shit you were going through yourself.”
She continued:
- “Im so proud of how far you’ve come.”
Regina concluded:
- “Thank you for showing me what a true friend is.”
Sarah then retweeted Regina’s post, affirmatively distributing Regina’s message to her own audience.
Public Mutual Reinforcement
The post shows Sarah and Regina publicly validating each other during the developing campaign against Onision and Lucas.
Regina presented:
- Sarah as someone who had endured serious hardship
- herself as someone experiencing related hardship
- Sarah as a trusted ally
- their relationship as one of mutual emotional support
- their public narratives as connected
- the campaign around Sarah as something Regina personally endorsed
Sarah’s retweet was not passive association. She deliberately amplified Regina’s statement and displayed their alliance to her own followers.
Regina’s Reversal Since January 2019
The timing creates a major contradiction.
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly defended Lucas and Sarah, writing that the controversy was:
- “incredibly ridiculous drama”
She said the matter had already been addressed and stated:
- “Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions”
Regina also corrected supposed evidence being circulated online:
- “the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
and:
- “the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
She additionally sent:
- “all my love to them”
By September 2019, Regina had reversed course and publicly joined Sarah’s side of the controversy.
The sequence is:
- Regina dismissed the allegations as old and ridiculous
- Regina defended Lucas and Sarah
- Regina rejected screenshots being circulated as evidence
- Regina publicly expressed love toward the people being attacked
- Months later, Regina aligned herself with Sarah’s accusation campaign
- Sarah publicly amplified that alliance
This was not simply Regina learning that Sarah held a different opinion. Regina had previously spoken as someone familiar with the disputed events and had personally corrected the supposed evidence.
Source
Regina’s public Twitter post dated September 7, 2019.
Sarah publicly retweeted the post.
Original accounts:
https://twitter.com/notsolillioness
Archived account captures:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/notsolillioness
Exhibit 121.
Related evidence:
- Regina previously dismisses the allegations and defends Lucas
- Regina previously sends her love to the household
- Sarah: Claimed Harm and Damages
- Sarah: Defamation Claims
September 10, 2019: Rejected & Bitter Regina Admits She Sought Renewed Friendship With Lucas While Lucas Clearly Shows No Interest In Her
On September 10, 2019, Regina publicly admitted that she had actively wanted to restore her friendship with Lucas contradicting her legal complaint where she claims she was some traumatized victim of the same person she is seen here begging to be her friend.
Regina wrote:
“And then I really wanted to be close again”
She further stated that she and Lucas later resumed contact:
“We reconnected as (close) friends about 4/5 mos ago”
Regina attached a private message exchange showing that she was the person seeking renewed friendship. Regina asked Lucas:
“Are we ever gonna be friends like we used to be.”
Lucas responded:
“I'm not sure”
Regina continued:
“Why aren't you sure.”
She then pressed Lucas for a definitive answer:
“All I'm asking is for honesty. I'm not going to be mad regardless of the answer.”
Lucas made no promise of renewed closeness and answered:
“Can't tell the future”
Regina replied:
“Okay.”
What the record directly shows
Regina’s own public post and private messages establish that:
- Regina expressly stated that she “really wanted to be close again.”
- Regina initiated the request to restore her friendship with Lucas.
- Regina asked Lucas whether they would ever be friends as they had been before.
- Lucas did not reciprocate Regina’s desire for renewed closeness.
- Lucas stated that he was unsure about resuming the friendship.
- Lucas refused to promise Regina any future contact or closeness.
- Regina pressed Lucas for a more definitive answer.
- Lucas remained restrained and noncommittal.
- Regina later admitted that she voluntarily reconnected with Lucas as a close friend.
- The desire to restore contact came from Regina, not Lucas.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
Regina's legal complaint alleges that Lucas groomed Regina, caused her to develop romantic feelings, psychologically harmed her, and conspired with Onision to lure and entice her for sexual purposes. Regina’s own post records the opposite communication pattern.
Regina expressly admitted:
“I really wanted to be close again”
The embedded messages show Regina asking Lucas to restore their friendship while Lucas declined to promise that renewed closeness would occur.
The complaint portrays Lucas as the persistent pursuer. Regina’s own evidence shows Lucas distancing himself while Regina attempted to draw him back into regular communication.
Lucas did not:
- ask Regina to become close again,
- encourage her emotional attachment,
- promise future intimacy,
- pressure her to maintain contact,
- or attempt to arrange an in-person meeting.
Instead, Lucas responded:
“I'm not sure”
and:
“Can't tell the future”
Regina’s own evidence therefore directly contradicts the allegation that Lucas was pursuing, controlling, or cultivating her attachment. Regina was seeking renewed access to Lucas while Lucas refused to guarantee that even an ordinary friendship would resume.
Why it matters
Regina’s later accusations require the public to believe that Lucas maintained control over her through grooming, emotional manipulation, and sustained pursuit.
Her own post dismantles that portrayal.
Regina was the person who:
- wanted to become close again,
- initiated the request to restore their friendship,
- pressed Lucas for an answer,
- and later voluntarily reconnected with him.
Lucas was the person who remained uncertain, restrained, and unwilling to promise friendship.
The exchange is especially damaging to Regina’s later narrative because Regina selected and publicly posted the evidence herself. The messages she chose to publish show that Lucas was not pursuing her. They show Regina attempting to restore access to someone who had already distanced himself from her (as Regina herself prior confessed to being a drug addict, and that being part of why she was slowly becoming a rejected and bitter person).
Regina later claimed that she eventually “dropped” Lucas after hearing allegations involving Sarah. That later decision does not alter the chronology Regina herself disclosed: she had previously worked to restore the friendship, successfully reestablished contact, and described herself as having wanted renewed closeness. Her own words place the initiative, desire, and effort with Regina. The documented communication places distance, uncertainty, and restraint with Lucas. The question becomes: Why were you so desperate to integrate yourself into Lucas's life, only to later claim you were some traumatized victim after Lucas rejected you and showed a repeat disinterest in you, a self-admitted drug addict.
Source
September 10, 2019 Twitter post by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.
The post contained a private message exchange between Regina and Lucas. Regina’s messages appear in blue and Lucas’s messages appear in gray.
The screenshot was later included as Exhibit 168 in the defendants’ evidentiary submission.
Consolidated Third Amended Complaint, paragraphs 413–417 and 423–424.