Regina/Grooming
Chronological Evidence Review
Regina: Grooming Allegations
Regina’s later grooming and exploitation claims compared with her unsolicited contact, affection toward Lucas, repeated efforts to remain connected, public defenses of Lucas, and contemporaneous statements from the relevant period.
Related: Damages · Complete Record · Forum Allegations · Sarah’s Grooming Claims
October 2, 2016: Regina Tells Lucas She Misses Him While Lucas Shows Little Interest
On October 2, 2016, Regina contacted Lucas after watching an Onision video:
- “I saw Greg’s video and I’m just worried abt you and all the bs drama..”
She then told Lucas:
- “And I miss you.”
Lucas did not say that he missed Regina. He replied only:
- “Well we are still together”
Regina continued discussing the public controversy. One week later, she again initiated contact by asking whether Lucas still had a post-office box. Lucas answered:
- “No”
The Contradiction
The exchange shows Regina voluntarily pursuing Lucas after the period she later portrayed as abusive and exploitative.
Regina:
- initiated the conversation
- expressed concern for Lucas
- told him she missed him
- attempted further contact a week later
Lucas did not pursue her, flirt with her, pressure her, or reciprocate her emotional statement. His responses were short and detached.
The contemporaneous record therefore shows Regina treating Lucas as someone she valued and wanted continued access to—not someone she feared or was attempting to escape.
Source
Facebook Messenger exchange dated October 2 and October 9, 2016.
Regina’s messages appear in blue. Lucas’s messages appear in gray.
The screenshot was captured by Regina from her phone and later posted publicly.
Related evidence:
January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Defends Lucas, Calls the Controversy “Ridiculous Drama,” and Identifies a Circulated Screenshot as a Meme
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly responded to allegations involving Lucas and Sarah.
Regina wrote:
- “it’s incredibly ridiculous drama from 3+ yrs ago tht has been addressed previously is being brought up for absolutely no reason.”
She continued:
- “Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions w/o having their lives being dictated by the internet. this needs to stop.”
In a related response, Regina addressed screenshots being circulated as supposed evidence:
- “1. the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
She then stated:
- “2. the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
Regina’s Public Position
Regina did not publicly describe herself as a victim of Lucas or Onision.
Instead, she:
- characterized the controversy as old and previously addressed
- called its renewed circulation “ridiculous drama”
- publicly defended Lucas
- supported Lucas and Sarah’s right to make their own decisions
- rejected internet interference in their lives
- corrected the authorship of one screenshot
- identified another screenshot as a meme
- told the people circulating it to “grow up”
This was Regina speaking publicly in her own words, years after the period later described in the complaint as grooming and
attempted exploitation.
The Later Victim Narrative
The later complaint presents Regina as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and harmed by Lucas and Onision before this tweet was published.
That makes her January 2019 position especially significant.
At the time, Regina did not say:
- Lucas had groomed her
- Onision had conspired in her exploitation
- the old screenshots documented criminal conduct
- the controversy exposed abuse that had happened to her
- Sarah was being drawn into the same predatory system
She said the opposite.
Regina publicly treated the allegations as recycled internet drama, defended Lucas’s autonomy, defended Sarah’s autonomy, and rejected the supposed screenshot evidence.
The Chronological Conflict
The contradiction cannot be explained merely by saying Regina had not yet processed recent events.
According to the complaint’s chronology, the alleged conduct involving Regina had occurred years earlier. By January 2019, Regina was an adult and had substantial distance from the alleged events.
Nevertheless, her public position remained:
- “it’s incredibly ridiculous drama”
and:
- “this needs to stop.”
Regina was therefore not publicly acting as though the screenshots revealed abuse committed against her. She was correcting them, dismissing them, and defending the people she later accused.
Regina Identifies the Evidence as Misrepresented
Regina’s second post is independently important because she distinguishes between two images being circulated:
- One screenshot contained Regina’s own messages, not a conversation between Lucas and Sarah
- The other was, according to Regina, a meme
This shows that Regina believed supposed evidence was being falsely attributed or stripped of context.
The later complaint relies heavily on online messages, screenshots, and interpretations of past communications. Regina’s contemporaneous correction demonstrates that at least some of the material circulated publicly was not what accusers claimed it was.
Her exact response was:
- “the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
and:
- “the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
Regina Later Adopts the Position She Rejected
Regina eventually became a plaintiff alleging that Lucas groomed and exploited her while she was a minor and that Onision participated in the alleged scheme.
That later position is materially inconsistent with her January 2019 public conduct.
In 2019, Regina:
- defended Lucas
- dismissed the controversy
- rejected the evidence being circulated
- insisted the matter had already been addressed
- demanded that outsiders stop interfering
- treated the allegations as unreasonable internet drama
The later complaint transforms the same historical period into the foundation for claims seeking substantial damages.
The public record therefore requires an explanation for when, why, and on what new evidence Regina changed from defending Lucas and rejecting the allegations to presenting herself as one of his victims.
Source
Regina’s public Twitter posts dated January 10, 2019.
Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Exhibit 95.
Related pages:
January 10, 2019: Regina Publicly Sends “All My Love” to the People She Later Accused
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly replied to Onision:
- “all my love to them”
The statement appeared during the same public exchange in which Regina:
- called the allegations “incredibly ridiculous drama”
- said the controversy had already been addressed
- defended Lucas and Sarah as adults capable of making their own decisions
- demanded that the public interference stop
- corrected the false attribution of one screenshot
- identified another circulated screenshot as a meme
Regina’s Contemporaneous Position
Regina was not publicly describing the household as a source of fear, trauma, grooming, or exploitation.
Her public position was supportive and affectionate.
She dismissed the accusations and then sent:
- “all my love”
to the people being targeted by them.
This statement is especially significant because the later complaint alleges that Regina had already suffered serious misconduct involving Lucas and Onision years before this post.
Yet in January 2019, Regina was publicly:
- defending Lucas
- rejecting the supposed evidence
- calling the controversy ridiculous
- telling outsiders to stop interfering
- expressing love toward the people involved
The Later Reversal
Regina later adopted a fundamentally different account of the same historical period.
The later complaint portrays her as someone who had already been groomed, sexually exploited, and severely harmed before January 2019.
Her contemporaneous public conduct does not reflect that position.
Within the same exchange, Regina moved beyond merely disputing inaccurate screenshots. She publicly expressed affection toward the people she would later accuse.
This should be evaluated alongside her other January 10 statements rather than treated as an isolated phrase.
Together, the posts show that Regina’s expressed position at the time was:
- the controversy was old and ridiculous
- the supposed evidence was being misrepresented
- Lucas and Sarah deserved autonomy
- public interference needed to stop
- the household had her affection and support
Source
Regina’s public Twitter post dated January 10, 2019.
Original account: https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
Archived account captures: https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/http://twitter.com/hahan0bye
September 7, 2019: Sarah and Regina Publicly Align Their Accusation Campaigns
On September 7, 2019, Regina publicly aligned herself with Sarah through a message posted under the hashtag:
- #WeStandWithSarah
Regina wrote:
- “I love you. Thank you for being there for me through all the shit you were going through yourself.”
She continued:
- “Im so proud of how far you’ve come.”
Regina concluded:
- “Thank you for showing me what a true friend is.”
Sarah then retweeted Regina’s post, affirmatively distributing Regina’s message to her own audience.
Public Mutual Reinforcement
The post shows Sarah and Regina publicly validating each other during the developing campaign against Onision and Lucas.
Regina presented:
- Sarah as someone who had endured serious hardship
- herself as someone experiencing related hardship
- Sarah as a trusted ally
- their relationship as one of mutual emotional support
- their public narratives as connected
- the campaign around Sarah as something Regina personally endorsed
Sarah’s retweet was not passive association. She deliberately amplified Regina’s statement and displayed their alliance to her own followers.
Regina’s Reversal Since January 2019
The timing creates a major contradiction.
On January 10, 2019, Regina publicly defended Lucas and Sarah, writing that the controversy was:
- “incredibly ridiculous drama”
She said the matter had already been addressed and stated:
- “Sarah and Kai are adults and perfectly capable of making their own decisions”
Regina also corrected supposed evidence being circulated online:
- “the first screenshot is MY texts, NOT kai and sarah.”
and:
- “the second screenshot is fucking meme. grow up.”
She additionally sent:
- “all my love to them”
By September 2019, Regina had reversed course and publicly joined Sarah’s side of the controversy.
The sequence is:
- Regina dismissed the allegations as old and ridiculous
- Regina defended Lucas and Sarah
- Regina rejected screenshots being circulated as evidence
- Regina publicly expressed love toward the people being attacked
- Months later, Regina aligned herself with Sarah’s accusation campaign
- Sarah publicly amplified that alliance
This was not simply Regina learning that Sarah held a different opinion. Regina had previously spoken as someone familiar with the disputed events and had personally corrected the supposed evidence.
Source
Regina’s public Twitter post dated September 7, 2019.
Sarah publicly retweeted the post.
Original accounts:
https://twitter.com/notsolillioness
Archived account captures:
https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/hahan0bye
https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://twitter.com/notsolillioness
Exhibit 121.
Related evidence:
- Regina previously dismisses the allegations and defends Lucas
- Regina previously sends her love to the household
- Sarah: Claimed Harm and Damages
- Sarah: Defamation Claims
September 9, 2019: Regina Admits She Never Visited Onision or Lucas and Fell Out With Lucas
On September 9, 2019, Regina publicly admitted that she never visited Onision or Lucas and never was near them or their household.
Regina wrote:
“I was never at their house”
She described herself as having been primarily friends with Lucas beginning in 2012:
“I was just close friends w kai mainly starting in 2012.”
Regina then confirmed that the relationship ended before she was ever able to visit:
“Kai and I had a falling out before I was even able to visit due to me battling addiction”
What the record directly shows
Regina’s own statement establishes that:
- Regina never visited Onision or Lucas.
- Regina was never present anywhere near them or their household.
- Regina never met them despite her later allegations.
- Her friendship was with Lucas, not Onision.
- Regina and Lucas had a falling out before any visit occurred.
- Lucas did not continue the connection through an in-person meeting.
- Regina attributed the falling out to circumstances involving her own battle with addiction. (she is or was a drug addict, per her own admission)
- The alleged relationship ended without Regina ever traveling to meet Onision or Lucas.
Direct contradiction of the Third Amended Complaint
The Third Amended Complaint alleges that Lucas groomed Regina, caused her to develop romantic feelings, and conspired with Onision to lure, recruit, solicit, and entice her to travel to their home for sexual activity. Regina’s own public admission confirms that she never visited their home and that her friendship with Lucas ended before any meeting occurred.
The complaint portrays Onision and Lucas as aggressively pursuing Regina toward an in-person sexual encounter. Regina’s statement records the opposite outcome: Lucas ended the connection due to Regina being a drug addict before Regina could visit.
This is particularly damaging to the allegation that Onision and Lucas were operating together to obtain sexual access to Regina. Regina never met either of them, never entered their household, never even got anywhere near them, and identifies the relationship as primarily involving Lucas. Her own chronology supplies no completed meeting, no physical contact, no household access, and no continuing effort by Lucas to bring her into their home.
Why it matters
Regina’s later allegations depend on portraying herself as the target of a sustained joint effort by Onision and Lucas to lure her into their household for sexual purposes. Her own statement dismantles that portrayal.
Regina admits:
- she was never at their house,
- she never completed a visit,
- she really only communicated with Lucas,
- and Lucas ended the relationship before an in-person meeting ever occurred.
A person supposedly determined to lure Regina into his household for sex would not end the relationship before she could visit. Lucas’s decision to disengage is incompatible with the complaint’s theory that he was pursuing an ongoing trafficking or enticement objective.
Regina’s admission also removes Onision from the alleged interpersonal relationship. She described herself as primarily close with Lucas and confirmed that she never visited either person. The complaint nevertheless attempts to transform a terminated online friendship between people only three years apart in age into a coordinated trafficking venture involving Onision who had no interest in Regina. Onision described Regina, the one time he saw her avatar as a word synonymous with "Hideous" and compared her to Squidward from Sponge-Bob.
The contemporaneous public record instead shows that Regina never met Onision or Lucas and that Lucas rejected further involvement before any proposed visit occurred, according to Regina, due to her being a literal drug addict.
Source
September 9, 2019 Twitter post by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.
The screenshot was preserved from Regina’s public Twitter activity and later included as Exhibit 166 in the defendants’ evidentiary submission.