Continued Contact · Contemporaneous Notes · Recorded Admissions · Litigation Motive
Sarah’s Phone Calls: Admissions and Contradictions
Call logs, messages, contemporaneous notes, and a preserved 2024 recording document years of voluntary contact with Onision and Lucas, Sarah’s reported reluctance to sue, financial expectations involving YouTube, continued affection for Lucas, acknowledgments of prior statements, and conduct materially inconsistent with the later portrayal of fear, avoidance, and coercive control.
January 22, 2021: Nine-Hour Call Records Major Admissions by Sarah
Onision’s contemporaneous notes from a nine-hour call record Sarah admitting that she intentionally misled the public, acknowledged her two sexual-extortion apologies, attempted to silence Onision, and knew the laptop contained nothing incriminating.
On January 22, 2021, Onision contacted Sarah directly to obtain answers about the accusations and public campaign that had contributed to his deplatforming and loss of his primary income.
Sarah voluntarily remained on the telephone with Onision for more than nine hours. The conversation continued into the following morning and ended only after Sarah’s sister took the telephone, refused to return it, and yelled that she was happy Sarah had ruined Onision’s life.
Sarah was concerned that the conversation might be recorded. Onision assured her that it was not being recorded and instead took contemporaneous notes documenting the time, duration, and most significant statements.
Admissions Recorded During the Call
Onision’s notes record Sarah stating that:
Participants in the documentary were paid
She had received enough money to “make a down payment on a house”
She had twice apologized after being accused of sexually extorting Onision and Lucas
Her documentary agreement prevented her from revealing how much participants were paid
She hated Regina and Shiloh
She considered Regina and Shiloh to be frauds
She had intentionally misled people to make Onision look bad
Onision removed her from his life because of the offense she committed against him
She deliberately attempted to silence Onision and prevent interviews in which he could present evidence
The laptop she publicly portrayed as containing incriminating material actually had nothing on it
She turned over the laptop only because of pressure from the internet
The public had donated money to replace the laptop without being told that the surrendered device contained nothing incriminating
The Two Apologies
The notes are consistent with Sarah’s separate admission that she twice said:
“I’m sorry for raping you guys.”
Sarah later attempted to characterize those apologies as sarcasm or jokes. That explanation conflicts with the surrounding chronology:
Onision accused Sarah of sexual extortion while ending the relationship.
Sarah made the two apologies.
Sarah became angry and stormed away.
She later sobbed while holding Onision at the airport and begged him to forgive her.
She publicly admitted that the airport forgiveness scene occurred.
Only afterward did she begin dismissing the earlier apologies as sarcasm.
The January 2021 call records Sarah again acknowledging the two apologies, further undermining the attempt to portray them as meaningless jokes.
Evidence of Deliberate Narrative Manipulation
The most serious admission recorded in the notes is that Sarah intentionally misled people to make Onision look bad.
That admission connects several otherwise separate events:
Sarah’s public accusations became substantially more extreme over time
She attempted to prevent Onision from participating in interviews
Interviews containing her contradictory prior statements were later made private
She publicly coordinated with people she privately described as frauds
She promoted suspicions about a laptop she later admitted contained nothing incriminating
She later presented consensual adult conduct as assault in litigation
The notes therefore document more than ordinary disagreement or imperfect memory. They record Sarah acknowledging deliberate efforts to shape what the public heard while obstructing Onision’s ability to answer with evidence.
Documentary Payments and Motive
The notes also record Sarah admitting that documentary participants were compensated and that she had enough money to make a down payment on a house.
She further stated that confidentiality terms prevented her from revealing the amount paid.
This creates a direct financial-interest issue. Sarah publicly presented herself as exposing wrongdoing while privately acknowledging compensation substantial enough to materially improve her financial position.
Her hostility toward Regina and Shiloh also undermines the appearance of several independent, mutually corroborating accusers. According to the notes, Sarah privately described both women as frauds despite publicly participating in the same accusation campaign.
The Laptop Admission
Sarah had publicly allowed the laptop to become a central part of the accusation narrative. Supporters were encouraged to believe that it might contain evidence against Onision or Lucas, and money was raised to replace it after it was surrendered.
The notes record Sarah admitting that:
The laptop contained nothing incriminating
She turned it over only because the internet pressured her
Donors were not told that the device contained nothing supporting the public suspicions
This admission is consistent with the later police and FBI record, which did not establish criminal activity from the laptop.
The Significance of the Call Itself
Sarah remained in a voluntary, extended conversation with Onision for more than nine hours and resumed speaking with him the following morning.
The call shows Sarah calmly and deliberately communicating with the person she would later portray as a source of extreme fear and coercive control. She understood the importance of what she was saying, specifically asked whether she was being recorded, and continued the conversation after being assured that notes—not an audio recording—were being made.
The conversation ended because Sarah’s sister intervened, not because Sarah expressed fear of Onision or independently ended contact.
Source
Contemporaneous notes taken by Onision during a telephone conversation with Sarah beginning January 22, 2021 and continuing into January 23, 2021.
The call lasted more than nine hours. The statements above reproduce the material admissions recorded in those notes.
March 27, 2021: Onision Distributes His Call Notes to Online Commentators
Onision circulated his written summary of Sarah’s nine-hour phone call less than three months after it occurred, preserving her admissions while the public campaign against him remained active.
On March 27, 2021, Onision emailed several online commentators who had publicly covered and profited from the accusations against him.
The email memorialized the nine-hour January 22 call and the separate follow-up conversation the next morning. Onision also explained that Sarah had repeatedly expressed concern about being recorded and that he informed her Washington law prohibited recording the call without consent.
Contemporaneous Preservation
The timing is important. Onision distributed this summary approximately two months after the call—not years later after litigation disputes developed.
The email records that Sarah told him:
Documentary participants were paid and required to sign confidentiality agreements
She had enough money to make a down payment on a house
She had twice apologized following the accusation that she sexually extorted Onision and Lucas
She privately hated Regina and Shiloh and considered them frauds
She intentionally misled people to make Onision look bad
She attempted to prevent Onision from participating in interviews and presenting evidence
The laptop central to the public campaign contained nothing incriminating
She surrendered the laptop only because of internet pressure
The email also shows Onision correcting an earlier public position after receiving new information from Sarah. He acknowledged that his previous skepticism concerning documentary payments had been premature after Sarah directly confirmed that participants were compensated.
That willingness to correct the record strengthens the credibility of the notes: the email was not written merely to repeat a fixed narrative. It documented information that caused Onision to revise his own prior conclusion.
Evidentiary Significance
This email establishes that:
Onision documented the January conversation shortly after it occurred.
He preserved the date, duration, continuation into January 23, and Sarah’s recorded admissions.
He distributed the summary while the accusations and monetized online coverage were still active.
Multiple third parties received the account years before the present litigation disputes.
The central admissions therefore were not recently created for the wiki or reconstructed after the fact.
The recipients had an opportunity to investigate Sarah’s statements, correct their coverage, or request further evidence. The email documents Onision actively attempting to place contradictory facts before people whose audiences were being shown only the accusation narrative.
Source
Email sent by Onision on March 27, 2021, summarizing his January 22–23, 2021 telephone conversations with Sarah.
The email was sent from Onision’s account to multiple online commentators who had covered the accusations against him.
December 19, 2021: Sarah Says She Has “Healed,” “Moved On,” and Wants Nothing to Do With Regina
Contemporaneous call notes record Sarah saying she had “healed,” “moved on,” was not involved in litigation with Regina, and had no interest in Regina.
On December 19, 2021, Onision called Sarah after learning of a possible document delivery connected to Regina.
Shortly after the call, Onision emailed himself a summary of the conversation. The emails were sent at 10:17 and 10:18 p.m., preserving the substance of the approximately 9:00 p.m. call while it was still fresh.
The notes record Sarah stating that:
She was not part of any lawsuit involving Regina
She had “healed”
She had “moved on”
She had no interest in Regina
Shiloh was “out of her mind”
Onision was rude to her when she was a minor, and she stated she forgave his rudeness.
The Contradiction
More than two years after the relationship ended, Sarah voluntarily spoke with Onision, forgave him for past rudeness, and described herself as healed and having moved on.
She also distanced herself from the other public accusers by denying involvement with Regina, stating that she had no interest in Regina, and describing Shiloh as being “out of her mind.”
This conflicts with the later presentation of Sarah, Regina, and Shiloh as a unified group of mutually corroborating victims.
It also shows that Sarah’s own private position toward Regina and Shiloh was substantially different from the united public narrative later presented around them.
Source
Contemporaneous emails written by Onision immediately after his December 19, 2021 telephone conversation with Sarah.
The call occurred at approximately 9:00 p.m. The written summaries were emailed at 10:17 and 10:18 p.m.
December 19, 2021: Phone Log Corroborates Two Calls With Sarah
Onision’s phone log records two connected calls with Sarah on December 19, 2021, lasting a combined 35 minutes and 59 seconds.
This phone log independently corroborates the December 19, 2021 conversations documented in Onision’s contemporaneous email notes.
The log records:
A 31-minute, 50-second call beginning at 9:05 p.m.
A second 4-minute, 9-second call beginning at 9:52 p.m.
A combined conversation time of 35 minutes and 59 seconds
The times correspond with Onision’s notes stating that the conversation began at approximately 9:00 p.m. and was summarized by email shortly afterward at 10:17 and 10:18 p.m.
Evidentiary Significance
The phone record confirms that the documented conversation occurred and was substantial—not a brief unanswered call or attempted contact.
Sarah participated in more than half an hour of communication with Onision and then spoke with him again later that evening. During those conversations, she said she had “healed” and “moved on,” accepted his limited apology for having been rude to her as a minor, denied involvement in litigation with Regina, and distanced herself from Regina and Shiloh.
The call history corroborates continued direct communication rather than avoidance of Onision out of fear.
Source
Phone-call history captured from Onision’s mobile device on December 19, 2021.
February 2023: Sarah Says Lucas’s Rejection Led Her to Seek Love From Onision
Contemporaneous notes record Sarah explaining that she felt rejected by Lucas and wanted someone to love her, while also asking Lucas to check on Onision after learning that her conduct had hurt him.
In February 2023, Sarah participated in another lengthy and voluntary telephone conversation with Lucas.
The notes record that they spoke from approximately 9:25 p.m. until 11:27 p.m., primarily discussing music, old videos, and events in their lives.
During the call, Onision entered the room and explained that his feelings were hurt because he believed Sarah had used him to retaliate against Lucas.
The notes state:
“James came in the room and wanted to talk about his feelings being hurt because he thought that she had only used him to get back at me.”
Sarah became upset during the discussion, and Onision left the room. Sarah then explained her motive to Lucas:
“She clarified to me that really she just felt rejected by me and wanted someone to love her.”
Sarah also asked Lucas to check on Onision:
“She wanted me to make sure he was ok.”
The notes further record that Sarah told Lucas he was:
“still the best friend she’s ever had”
What the Call Establishes
Sarah’s explanation places her sexual and romantic pursuit of Onision within her reaction to feeling rejected by Lucas.
Rather than describing herself as frightened of Onision or forced into the relationship, Sarah explained that she felt rejected and wanted another person to love her.
The call also shows that:
Sarah remained in extended, voluntary contact with Lucas in 2023
She continued describing Lucas as the best friend she had ever had
She understood that her conduct had emotionally harmed Onision
She asked Lucas to make sure Onision was okay
Onision confronted Sarah directly about feeling used
Sarah discussed emotional rejection and her desire to be loved, not sexual coercion
Sarah explained that Lucas’s rejection drove her to seek love and validation from Onision. She also recognized that Onision felt used and emotionally harmed by what happened, then asked Lucas to check on him and make sure he was okay.
Her own explanation frames the relationship as a response to rejection and a desire to be loved. It directly contradicts the later claim that her involvement with Onision resulted from fear, coercion, or an inability to choose.
Source
Contemporaneous notes taken after telephone conversations involving Sarah, Lucas, and Onision in February 2023.
The primary conversation documented here lasted from approximately 9:25 p.m. until 11:27 p.m.
February 2023: Sarah Casually Reconnects With Lucas, As Lucas Takes Notes About All Their Communications As Evidence, Shortly Before Sarah's Legal Action
Shortly before the later lawsuit, Sarah casually exchanged music recommendations with Lucas and voluntarily arranged another late-night telephone conversation.
In February 2023, Sarah remained in active, friendly contact with Lucas.
Lucas asked:
“Hey I’m not sure what time you get off work, I don’t want to bug you lol did you want to talk again tonight?”
Sarah responded:
“yeah im out with friends right now but like 11pm/12am my time I’ll be free!”
Lucas replied:
“Sounds like a plan. Take your time I should be around so just call when you’re ready.”
The conversation then continued casually through shared music recommendations and discussion of albums.
What the Messages Establish
The exchange confirms that Sarah:
Voluntarily arranged additional late-night calls with Lucas
Continued speaking with him repeatedly
Shared casual interests and personal details
Communicated comfortably and without visible fear
Remained socially connected to the household shortly before the later lawsuit
These dated Snapchat messages independently corroborate the February 2023 call logs and contemporaneous notes documenting lengthy conversations involving Sarah, Lucas, and Onision.
They also strengthen the surrounding record that Sarah privately denied interest in litigation involving Regina while continuing friendly contact with the people she would soon accuse publicly and in court.
The chronology is direct: Sarah was casually reconnecting, arranging calls, discussing music, and speaking personally with Lucas and Onision shortly before joining litigation that portrayed the household as a source of extreme psychological control and abuse.
Source
Photographs of Lucas’s phone displaying Snapchat conversations with Sarah during February 2023.
February 2023: Lucas Preserves Sarah’s Casual Messages and Repeated Call Arrangements
Sarah casually discusses music, friends, sleep, and dreams with Lucas during their renewed February 2023 communication.
Throughout February 2023, Lucas preserved Sarah’s Snapchat messages while separately documenting their lengthy telephone conversations.
The screenshots show Sarah comfortably discussing:
Music and videos
Dreams and nights out with friends
Memes and shared jokes
Work
Medical concerns
Personal memories
Additional telephone calls with Lucas
In one exchange, Lucas asked:
“Are you busy? Have time for a quick call?”
Sarah responded:
“nah im free, just chillin in bed”
In another exchange, Sarah agreed to speak again at approximately 11:00 p.m. or midnight.
Sarah exchanges memes with Lucas and discusses personal concerns about wisdom-tooth surgery.
Why Lucas Preserved the Communications
Lucas states that speaking with Sarah was emotionally difficult because he regarded her as the person who had sexually extorted, deceived, and publicly harmed the household.
He nevertheless continued communicating long enough to document Sarah’s conduct and statements because he anticipated that she might later deny the contact, misrepresent what had been discussed, or pursue legal action.
The screenshots confirm that this preservation effort was occurring contemporaneously. Lucas was not attempting to reconstruct the conversations years later. He photographed the messages, retained call histories, and took notes while Sarah was actively communicating with him.
What the Screenshots Establish
The dated records confirm that Sarah:
Remained in active contact with Lucas in February 2023
Shared intimate and ordinary details of her daily life
Communicated in a relaxed, joking, and familiar tone
Continued discussing shared interests and memories
Spoke directly with both Lucas and Onision during the same period
These screenshots independently corroborate the February 2023 call logs and contemporaneous notes. They prove that the extensive
Sarah tells Lucas she is free to speak and separately agrees to another late-night telephone conversation.
conversations documented by Lucas occurred during the period stated.
Sarah privately communicated as though ordinary personal contact had resumed, while Lucas preserved the exchanges because he feared she would later present a substantially different account.
Source
Photographs of Lucas’s phone displaying Snapchat conversations with Sarah during February 2023.
The screenshots were preserved contemporaneously as part of Lucas’s documentation of Sarah’s messages, calls, and statements.
February 9, 2023: Sarah’s Friend Lane Coordinates Renewed Contact With the Household
Sarah’s friend Lane helped coordinate renewed communication with Onision and Lucas, asking whether Lucas was still available after speaking with Onision for approximately two hours.
On February 9, 2023, Sarah’s friend Lane acted as an intermediary while communication reopened between Sarah, Onision, and Lucas.
After speaking with Lane for approximately two hours, Onision wrote:
“Thanks for talking to me today. I really appreciated the 2 hour (ish) conversation and you really helped me feel a lot better.”
He added:
“You sound like you are a good friend and I appreciate so much of what you said. If I am upset in the future, I hope you will let me call you, but if you don’t want to hear from me, I’ll respect that as well.”
Lane later replied:
“I’m free now. is kai still around?”
What the Exchange Establishes
The messages document a cooperative and permission-based process:
Sarah’s friend voluntarily spoke with Onision for approximately two hours
Onision expressly stated that he would respect Lane’s boundaries
Lane remained willing to continue communicating
Lane asked whether Lucas was available
Lane helped coordinate the conversations that followed with Sarah
This exchange establishes the beginning of the February 2023 communication chain. The later Snapchat messages, call logs, and contemporaneous notes confirm that Sarah then participated in repeated and lengthy conversations with Lucas and Onision.
The evidence shows that contact was not forced, secretive, or threatening. It was facilitated by Sarah’s own friend, followed by Sarah freely speaking with the household, arranging additional calls, sharing personal information, and describing Lucas as the best friend she had ever had.
The sequence sharply conflicts with the later portrayal that Sarah was avoiding the household from fear or was psychologically unable to communicate with them voluntarily.
Source
February 9, 2023 iMessage conversation between Onision and Sarah’s friend Lane.
Onision’s messages appear in blue and Lane’s messages appear in gray.
February 12–17, 2023: Call Logs Corroborate Repeated, Lengthy Contact With Sarah
Lucas’s Google Voice history records repeated calls with Sarah during February 2023, including a connected conversation lasting nearly three hours.
Lucas’s Google Voice history documents repeated telephone contact with Sarah during February 2023.
The visible log includes calls on:
February 12
February 14
February 15
February 17
The February 14 call lasted:
“2 hr, 44 min, 46 sec”
This independently corroborates the contemporaneous notes documenting lengthy personal conversations between Sarah, Lucas, and Onision during the same period.
What the Call Log Establishes
The record confirms that Sarah remained in sustained contact with the Onision household immediately before the later litigation.
These were not isolated unanswered calls. The call history documents repeated communication and at least one connected conversation lasting nearly three hours.
Read with the dated Snapchat messages and contemporaneous call notes, the record establishes that Sarah:
Continued speaking extensively with Lucas
Shared highly personal information about relationships, sexual health, drug use, and conflicts with other men
Continued discussing her history with Onision
Referred to Lucas as the best friend she had ever had
Agreed to continue future conversations
Maintained ongoing contact years after the events she later characterized as severe abuse
The dated logs materially strengthen the credibility of the surrounding notes because they independently verify that the documented calls occurred when Lucas recorded them.
They also contradict the portrayal that Sarah avoided Onision and Lucas out of fear. The evidence shows repeated, lengthy, voluntary communication continuing into February 2023.
Source
Google Voice call history captured from Lucas’s phone, documenting calls with Sarah between February 12 and February 17, 2023.
February 12, 2023: Sarah Says She Did Not Want to Sue Onision or Lucas and Was Told There Was Money Available From YouTube
Contemporaneous call notes record Sarah saying she did not want to sue Onision or Lucas, did not want to testify, had no animosity toward them, and had been told by lawyers that money might be available through YouTube or a settlement.
On February 12, 2023, Sarah spoke with Lucas from approximately 7:49 p.m. until 10:28 p.m.
Lucas’s contemporaneous notes record that Sarah was still deciding whether she wanted to participate in the proposed lawsuit and needed additional time to consider it.
According to the notes, Sarah said:
she never originally wanted to file a lawsuit
she was still uncertain about participating
she did not want to testify
she did not have animosity toward Onision or Lucas
she wanted to move on with her life
she wanted privacy
she intended to consult a family-friend attorney
the lawyers had told her there was money available through YouTube
the lawyers believed the matter might settle
The notes state:
“She told me that she never really wanted to file in the first place but really only did because James wouldn’t stop talking Onision’s bankruptcy attorney reported that Sarah and Regina were preparing $5 million claims each while their legal representative stated that they were “really only interested in getting money from Google.”about her.”
They further record:
“She said the lawyers told her there was money in it from YouTube and that they might settle.”
Sarah Did Not Describe a Desire to Pursue Onision or Lucas
Sarah did not describe the proposed lawsuit as something she had long wanted because she feared Onision or Lucas, needed protection from them, or wanted a court to adjudicate alleged abuse.
The notes instead record that:
she did not want to file
she did not want to testify
she had no continuing animosity toward Onision or Lucas
she wanted the controversy to end
she wanted to move on privately
the principal financial opportunity described to her involved YouTube
This is materially different from the later litigation narrative presenting Sarah as a determined victim seeking remedy from Onision and Lucas for severe alleged criminal conduct.
The Lawsuit Was Presented as a Financial Opportunity Involving YouTube
The notes specifically record Sarah saying that attorneys told her:
“there was money in it from YouTube”
and:
“they might settle”
This identifies the financial appeal presented to Sarah as recovery from a large corporate defendant.
It is consistent with the later information that the plaintiffs were focused heavily on obtaining money from Google and YouTube, while Sarah remained reluctant to proceed personally against Onision and Lucas.
The conversation raises important questions concerning:
who recruited Sarah into the lawsuit
what financial representations were made to her
whether she was told a settlement was likely
whether she was encouraged to participate primarily to pursue corporate money
when she first agreed to become a plaintiff
whether she understood that the lawsuit would require testimony against Onision and Lucas
whether her reluctance was disclosed to the court or opposing parties
Sarah Says She Has No Animosity and Wants to Move On
The notes record that Sarah:
“doesn’t want to do this anymore or hold the animosity towards each other anymore.”
They further state that she:
“did not want to do this lawsuit and wants to be able to move on with her life and have privacy.”
This is inconsistent with portraying Sarah as unable to safely communicate with Lucas or as driven by ongoing terror of the household.
The call lasted approximately two hours and thirty-nine minutes. After discussing the lawsuit, Sarah and Lucas reportedly continued talking about ordinary subjects in their lives.
Sarah voluntarily remained in extended personal contact with Lucas while privately stating that she did not want to litigate against the household.
Sarah’s Stated Reason for Considering the Lawsuit
According to the notes, Sarah said she considered filing because Onision continued discussing her publicly.
That explanation must be considered alongside the public chronology.
Sarah had:
participated in interviews concerning Onision and Lucas
appeared in an internationally distributed documentary
publicly discussed their sexual history
invited Onision to “say whatever” and “bring it”
repeatedly told him to use damaging information against her
publicly announced that she could “say whatever I want”
Sarah therefore helped create and sustain the public controversy before objecting to Onision responding to her accusations.
The notes do not record Sarah saying she wanted a lawsuit because the historical allegations were true and required adjudication. They record frustration that Onision continued answering the accusations publicly.
Additional Statements About Sarah’s Conduct
During the same conversation, the notes record Sarah discussing former friends who had encouraged dangerous behavior, including:
driving while intoxicated
being involved in an automobile accident
not wearing a seatbelt during the accident
These statements further depict Sarah discussing self-directed conduct in Michigan, rather than describing control by Onision or Lucas in Washington.
The Later Litigation Contradiction
The later lawsuit presents Sarah as a committed plaintiff seeking damages from Onision and Lucas for grooming, coercion, trafficking, assault, and related misconduct.
The February 12 call notes record a materially different private position:
Sarah never wanted to file
Sarah did not want to testify
Sarah had no animosity toward Onision or Lucas
Sarah wanted privacy
Sarah wanted to move on
lawyers told her that money was available from YouTube
lawyers suggested the case might settle
This evidence is relevant to Sarah’s motive, recruitment into the litigation, willingness to testify, claimed fear, and the financial expectations communicated before the lawsuit proceeded.
Source
Contemporaneous notes documenting a telephone conversation between Sarah and Lucas from approximately 7:49 p.m. until 10:28 p.m. on February 12, 2023.
The date originally typed in the note heading as March 12, 2023 was an error. The correct date is February 12, 2023.
February 16, 2023: Dated Snapchat Messages Confirm Ongoing Contact and Sarah’s Threatening Conduct
A dated Snapchat exchange with Lucas records Sarah saying she located a man at approximately 4 a.m., drove to him, demanded that he come outside and fight her, and insulted him when he refused.
On February 16, 2023, Sarah discussed an accusation that she had transmitted a sexually transmitted infection to a man in Michigan.
Sarah told Lucas:
“This dude I haven’t spoken to in months posted on his story and tagged me that I gave him an STI.”
She denied the accusation, stating that she used condoms, underwent regular testing, and possessed medical records supporting her denial.
Sarah then described her response:
“Nah I was going psychotic. I drove to where his location was at like 4 am and told him to come outside and fucking fight me.”
When Lucas asked whether the man came outside, Sarah replied:
“Nah he was being a pussy bitch.”
The Dated Messages Corroborate the 2023 Communication Timeline
These screenshots visibly identify Sarah as the Snapchat contact and include the date February 16, 2023.
They independently confirm that Sarah was actively and voluntarily communicating with Lucas during the same period documented in the February 2023 phone-call notes.
Read together, the records establish a consistent timeline:
Sarah remained in direct contact with Lucas years after the relationship ended
She participated in extended personal conversations with the household
She discussed private details of her relationships, sexual health, and conflicts with other men
She continued describing Lucas as someone she trusted with highly personal information
The dated Snapchat exchange corroborates the surrounding notes documenting Sarah’s continued calls and contact with both Lucas and Onision
Sarah’s Own Description of Her Conduct
Sarah portrays herself as the aggressor in this incident.
According to her own messages, she:
Located the man after seeing his accusation
Drove to his location at approximately 4 a.m.
Demanded that he come outside
Threatened a physical confrontation
Insulted him
Described herself as “going psychotic”
This is direct evidence of Sarah confronting a man aggressively when she believed he had publicly lied about her.
It also follows her earlier hostile statement that she “hate[d] men.” Her own messages show that she was capable of tracking down a man, traveling to confront him, issuing a physical challenge, and using openly aggressive language.
That conduct directly conflicts with the later portrayal of Sarah as unable to confront men, unable to assert boundaries, or psychologically incapable of resisting people she believed had mistreated her.
Source
Snapchat conversation between Sarah and Lucas dated February 16, 2023.
The exchange was preserved by recording Lucas’s Snapchat screen with a second device.
February 17, 2023: Sarah Discusses Impaired Driving, Drug Use, and Killing Men She Considers “Bad”
During a two-hour call with Lucas, Sarah discussed marijuana use while driving, cocaine use at work, LSD, underage drinking, and said she could see herself becoming a serial killer targeting men she considered “bad.”
On February 17, 2023, Sarah voluntarily spoke with Lucas for more than two hours, from approximately 10:05 p.m. until 12:10 a.m.
The conversation itself further confirms that Sarah remained in active personal contact with Lucas immediately before the later litigation. She discussed private details about her sexual health, substance use, employment history, family, and violent thoughts.
The notes record that Sarah:
Frequently smoked marijuana while driving
Had used LSD twice
Used cocaine before serving customers while working as a waitress
Drank tequila “shot for shot” with college-aged men at parties hosted by her mother while she was underage
Was being publicly accused by a former sexual partner of transmitting chlamydia
Said she could see herself becoming a serial killer who targeted men she considered “bad”
Added that if men began being killed in Michigan, “it’s probably her”
The Violent Statement
The notes state:
“She also said she could see herself becoming a serial killer for men who are bad and if people start getting killed in Michigan that it’s probably her.”
This was not an isolated record of Sarah using aggressive language. During the same period, Sarah told Lucas that she had located another man at approximately 4 a.m., driven to him, demanded that he come outside and fight her, and insulted him when he refused.
Together, the dated Snapchat messages and these call notes show Sarah openly describing herself as:
Aggressive toward men she believed had wronged her
Willing to locate and confront a man at his residence
Willing to threaten physical violence
Capable of expressing violent fantasies about killing men
Fully capable of asserting herself when angry
Sarah’s own conduct and statements directly contradict the later portrayal that she was psychologically incapable of confronting men, expressing refusal, defending herself, or acting independently.
Corroboration of the Phone-Call Record
The independently dated February 16 Snapchat exchange proves that Sarah was actively communicating with Lucas during the same period covered by these notes.
That dated communication corroborates the surrounding record of extensive calls involving Sarah, Lucas, and Onision immediately before Sarah joined the later lawsuit. Sarah was voluntarily contacting them, discussing intimate personal matters, revisiting their shared history, and agreeing to continue speaking with Lucas.
The evidence supports the accuracy of the contemporaneous call chronology and the statements documented during it.
Source
Contemporaneous notes documenting a February 17, 2023 telephone conversation between Sarah and Lucas.
The conversation lasted from approximately 10:05 p.m. until 12:10 a.m.
April 29, 2023: Phone Record and Immediate Notes Document an Apparent Harassing Call Involving Sarah
Onision’s phone log and immediate notes document a 33-second insulting call from a 269-area-code number while a woman sounding like Sarah laughed in the background.
On April 29, 2023, Onision received a 33-second call from a telephone number using Michigan’s 269 area code.
Immediately afterward, he documented the exchange:
“Someone just called from Michigan saying ‘do you know what’s it’s like to be a dumb bitch?’ With a girl who sounded like Sarah laughing in the background.”
Onision responded:
“Is that all?”
The caller replied:
“Oh I have a lot to say if you got the time.”
After Onision stated that he did not know who was calling, the caller hung up.
What the Evidence Establishes
The exhibit preserves two matching contemporaneous records:
A phone log showing a 33-second incoming call at 9:36 p.m. from the same Michigan area code associated with Sarah’s documented contact information
Notes written immediately afterward recording the caller’s exact insult and a woman sounding like Sarah laughing in the background
The language also matches Sarah’s documented pattern when attacking men. Only weeks earlier, Sarah called the man who accused her of transmitting an STI a:
“pussy bitch”
She also admitted locating that man, driving to him at approximately 4 a.m., and demanding that he come outside and fight her.
Her public responses to Onision similarly relied on short, mocking phrases such as:
“rip”
and:
“damn he mad”
The April 29 caller’s use of “dumb bitch,” combined with the Michigan number, Sarah-like laughter, insulting tone, and Sarah’s established language pattern strongly supports the conclusion that the call originated from Sarah’s circle and that Sarah participated in the harassment.
The call continued the same documented pattern: Sarah and people associated with her contacting Onision to provoke, mock, and insult him—not avoiding him out of fear. Onision received no other prank calls from any area code anywhere near that time frame, further suggesting it is unlikely anyone else was pranking Onision.
Source
Onision’s mobile-phone call history and contemporaneous notes created immediately after the April 29, 2023 call.
August 7, 2024: Sarah Calls Onision at 6:39 A.M., Admits the Apologies and “Destroy Your Lives” Statement, Then Calls Them Jokes, Then Wishes His Cancer Would Return and Destroy His Body & Hangs Up
Sarah acknowledges making the two “rape” apologies and likely saying she could destroy Onision and Lucas’s lives, then attempts to dismiss both statements as jokes before wishing that Onision’s skin cancer would return.
On August 7, 2024, Sarah called Onision at approximately 6:39 a.m., waking him and immediately beginning a hostile confrontation.
Sarah laughed, insulted Onision, mocked the trauma he described, and repeatedly attempted to portray herself as having been a child during the disputed events. Onision corrected her:
“You were an adult, Sarah.”
Sarah Admits Making the Two Apologies
Onision confronted Sarah about the two times she said:
“I’m (Sarah is) sorry for raping you guys.”
Sarah did not deny saying it. After a long pause, she responded:
“Dude, it was sarcastic.”
When Onision asked how someone sarcastically apologizes for rape immediately after being accused and dumped, Sarah again defended the statement as ridicule rather than denying that she made it.
Later in the same call, she repeated:
“It was sarcastic because it was so ridiculous to me that you would ever even say that.”
The call therefore captures Sarah acknowledging the two apologies while attempting to change their meaning years afterward.
Sarah confesses publicly she begged Onision for forgiveness.
That explanation conflicts with the established chronology:
Onision accused Sarah of sexual extortion while ending the relationship.
Sarah apologized twice.
Sarah stormed away after the confrontation.
She later held Onision at the airport, sobbed, and begged him to forgive her.
Sarah publicly admitted that the airport forgiveness scene occurred.
She later began calling the original apologies sarcasm or jokes.
Her admission that she later begged forgiveness gives serious context to the apologies she now attempts to dismiss.
Sarah Admits the “Destroy Your Lives” Statement
Onision also confronted Sarah about telling both him and Lucas that she could destroy their lives.
Sarah initially responded:
“What?”
After Onision repeated the statement, Sarah paused and answered:
“As a joke!? Sure, I probably did.”
This is another admission followed by the same excuse.
Sarah acknowledges that she probably made the threat, but attempts to neutralize it by calling it a joke. Her later public campaign, deplatforming efforts, and litigation gave the statement direct significance: the destruction she described was subsequently carried out against the household’s income, reputation, and stability.
Sarah Initiates Contact While Claiming She Wants No Contact
Sarah stated:
“I called you because I want you to leave me alone.”
The contradiction is immediate: Sarah initiated the early-morning call, woke Onision, laughed at him, insulted him, and prolonged the confrontation while claiming that she wanted no contact.
When Onision raised the active lawsuit, Sarah mockingly responded in a “goofy voice”:
“I don’t know anything about that.”
When told to stop suing him, she laughed and said:
“I don’t even!”
The performance did not reflect confusion. Sarah openly mocked the existence of litigation in which she was being used to pursue millions of dollars from the household.
Mockery, Abuse, and a Wish for Physical Harm
Throughout the call, Sarah:
Laughed while Onision discussed trauma and therapy
Called him an “old fucking fart”
Mocked his attempt to defend himself
Claimed he had “no defense”
Repeatedly reframed her prior admissions as jokes
Initiated the call while demanding that he leave her alone
Sarah ended the call by stating:
“You are so old and disgusting, and I hope that the skin cancer comes back and eats your dick off. Like, on God.”
This was not avoidance by someone afraid to confront Onision. Sarah directly initiated contact, ridiculed his trauma, admitted making the key statements attributed to her, and wished that a serious illness would return and physically destroy him.
The Pattern Captured in One Call
The call exposes Sarah’s repeated method of dealing with damaging prior statements:
She acknowledges saying them
She avoids their original context
She labels them sarcasm or jokes
She mocks anyone who treats them seriously
She uses that explanation for both her two apologies and her statement that she could destroy Onision and Lucas’s lives.
The recording preserves Sarah admitting the statements herself. The remaining dispute is not whether she said them, but whether her later “joke” explanation can be reconciled with her conduct afterward—including begging Onision for forgiveness and participating in the campaign that devastated the household.
Source
Recorded telephone call placed by Sarah to Onision at approximately 6:39 a.m. on August 7, 2024.
August 7, 2024: Washington’s One-Party-Consent Exception Authorized Recording the 6:39 A.M. Call
RCW 9.73.030 permits one-party recording of calls that occur repeatedly or at an extremely inconvenient hour, providing the legal basis for recording Sarah’s 6:39 a.m. call.
Washington generally requires every participant’s consent before a private telephone conversation may be recorded. RCW 9.73.030 expressly creates exceptions to that rule.
Under RCW 9.73.030(2), a conversation may be recorded with the consent of only one participant when it:
Conveys threats of extortion, blackmail, bodily harm, or other unlawful demands
Occurs anonymously
Occurs repeatedly
Occurs at an extremely inconvenient hour
Sarah placed the August 7, 2024 call to Onision at approximately 6:39 a.m. The call followed prior unwanted and apparently coordinated telephone harassment, including the April 29, 2023 call from a Michigan-area number during which a woman sounding like Sarah laughed in the background.
Onision was a participant in the August 7 call and consented to its recording. The repeated-contact history and the extremely inconvenient hour placed the call within RCW 9.73.030(2)(c), which expressly permits recording with one party’s consent.
During the call, Sarah also:
Admitted making the two “I’m sorry for raping you guys” statements, while attempting to reclassify them as sarcasm
Acknowledged that she probably said she could destroy Onision and Lucas’s lives, while calling that statement a joke
Mocked Onision’s trauma and therapy
Initiated contact while simultaneously demanding that he leave her alone
Wished that his skin cancer would return and destroy part of his body
The recording therefore preserved a repeated early-morning harassment call containing admissions, ridicule, and an explicit wish for severe bodily harm. Its recording was supported by Washington’s statutory one-party-consent exception.
Onision’s phone log confirms that Sarah initiated the 6:39 a.m. call and remained connected for 11 minutes and 42 seconds.
Onision’s phone history independently confirms the occurrence, direction, time, and duration of Sarah’s August 7, 2024 call.
The record shows:
Sarah placed the call to Onision
The call began at 6:39 a.m.
The connected call lasted 11 minutes and 42 seconds
The call came from Sarah’s Michigan-area telephone number
Sarah’s call awakened Onision at an extremely inconvenient hour. Because he was asleep and away from recording equipment when the call began, only the later portion of the conversation was captured.
Corroboration of the Recorded Call
The phone record matches the preserved audio and transcript in which Sarah:
Admitted making the two “I’m sorry for raping you guys” statements
Claimed those apologies were sarcastic
Acknowledged that she probably said she could destroy Onision and Lucas’s lives
Attempted to dismiss that statement as a joke
Mocked Onision’s trauma and therapy
Denied knowledge of the lawsuit while laughing
Wished that Onision’s skin cancer would return and destroy his body
The call log establishes that Sarah initiated this confrontation. She was not responding to contact from Onision; she called him before 7:00 a.m., remained connected for nearly twelve minutes, and used the call to ridicule, insult, and harass him.
Legal Basis for Recording
RCW 9.73.030(2) permits a participant to record a telephone conversation with one-party consent when the communication:
Conveys threats of extortion, blackmail, bodily harm, or other unlawful demands
Occurs anonymously (like the prank call received before)
Occurs repeatedly (like the prank call received before)
Occurs at an extremely inconvenient hour
The 6:39 a.m. timing and the documented history of repeated unwanted calls independently placed this communication within the statute’s one-party-consent exception.
Source
Phone-call history captured from Onision’s mobile device on August 7, 2024.
