Sarah/Trafficking
January 15, 2021: Sarah Provides No New Information and Police Again Find No Crime Victim
On January 15, 2021, police contacted Sarah again regarding her relationship with Onision and Lucas.
The report states:
- “Sarah seemed surprised that I was following up with her again and told me she did not have any new information to report since we last spoke in March 2020.”
The investigator concluded:
- “Based on the information I had obtained at that time, it did not appear Sarah was a victim of a crime in PCSD jurisdiction.”
The report also summarizes Sarah’s earlier account:
- “Sarah told me she had been involved in a sexual relationship with Jackson but was over 18 years of age during the relationship and had fully consented to the sexual activity.”
It further records that Sarah:
- “was not sure she was a victim of any crime in Pierce County or Washington State.”
The Contradiction
Nearly a year after her first police interview, Sarah still supplied no allegation or new evidence establishing rape, molestation, exploitation of a minor, or any other crime.
The police record remained consistent:
- Sarah was over 18 during the sexual relationship.
- Sarah fully consented to the sexual activity.
- Sarah was unsure that she had been the victim of any crime.
- Sarah provided no new information in January 2021.
- Police again concluded that she did not appear to be a crime victim within their jurisdiction.
- Sarah stood on the narrative she originally told police for almost a year, and had no change in her narrative reported whatsoever.
This directly conflicts with the severe assault narrative Sarah later presented in litigation.
Source
Pierce County Sheriff Department Incident Report 2101900529.1, documenting the January 15, 2021 follow-up with Sarah.
August–November 2017: Sarah Lived in Separate Quarters, Worked at Target, and Reported No Sexual Discussions
Sarah told police that she stayed on the Onision household’s property from August through November 2017 while she was still a minor.
The report states that Sarah:
- “lived in a mother-in-law suite on their property”
It further records that she:
- “worked at a Target store in Puyallup”
Most importantly, Sarah told the investigator:
- “there was not any discussion of a sexual nature at the time”
She also said she remained emotionally closer to Lucas than to Onision.
The Contradiction
Sarah’s own police account documents a teenager who had:
- Separate living quarters
- Employment outside the property
- Regular travel to and from a Target store
- Contact with coworkers and the public
- The ability to earn her own income
- No noted isolation, indication of free roam to and from public areas
- No sexual discussions with Onision or Lucas during the visit
This record directly undermines later portrayals of Sarah as confined, sexually trafficked, or kept under constant household control.
She was living in designated quarters on the property, leaving for outside employment, participating in ordinary public life, and reporting that no sexual discussions occurred.
The facts Sarah gave police describe independent movement and nonsexual living arrangements—not sex trafficking or sexual exploitation of a minor.
Source
Pierce County Sheriff Department Incident Report 2005101355.1, documenting Sarah’s account of her August–November 2017 stay.