Sarah/Grooming: Difference between revisions
Created page with " === September 16, 2017: Sarah Rejects an Allegation Involving a 14-Year-Old === File:2017-09-16-Sarah-Rejects-Grooming-Allegation.jpg|alt=Screenshot of a September 16, 2017 Twitter conversation in which Sarah says Greg would have been disgusted by conduct involving a 14-year-old and calls the allegation false.|thumb|In a September 16, 2017 Twitter exchange, Sarah stated that Greg would have been “disgusted” by conduct involving a 14-year-old and said the person ma..." |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In this Twitter direct-message exchange, an Onision detractor known as “The Josh” asks Sarah why she does not believe a source making an allegation about Onision. | In this Twitter direct-message exchange, an Onision detractor known as “The Josh” asks Sarah why she does not believe a source making an allegation about Onision. | ||
Sarah responds:<blockquote>“Because I know Greg and he would not do that. A 14 year old? He would have been disgusted.”</blockquote>She then adds:<blockquote>“Whoever your source is is lying to you.”</blockquote> | Sarah responds:<blockquote>“Because I know Greg and he would not do that. A 14 year old? He would have been disgusted.”</blockquote>She then adds:<blockquote>“Whoever your source is is lying to you.”</blockquote>'''What the message directly shows:''' At the time of this conversation, Sarah did not merely say that she was uncertain or lacked information. She affirmatively stated that, based on personally knowing Onision, she believed he would be disgusted by the idea of sexual conduct involving a 14-year-old. She also stated that the person supplying the allegation was lying. | ||
'''What the message directly shows:''' At the time of this conversation, Sarah did not merely say that she was uncertain or lacked information. She affirmatively stated that, based on personally knowing Onision, she believed he would be disgusted by the idea of sexual conduct involving a 14-year-old. She also stated that the person supplying the allegation was lying. | |||
'''Why it matters:''' This statement was made before Sarah’s later grooming allegations. It is relevant because it shows that Sarah’s expressed view at the time was that Onision was opposed to sexual involvement with minors and would not engage in the conduct being alleged. The defense contends that this materially conflicts with the later claim that Onision was grooming or sexually targeting minors. | '''Why it matters:''' This statement was made before Sarah’s later grooming allegations. It is relevant because it shows that Sarah’s expressed view at the time was that Onision was opposed to sexual involvement with minors and would not engage in the conduct being alleged. The defense contends that this materially conflicts with the later claim that Onision was grooming or sexually targeting minors. | ||
'''Source:''' Twitter direct-message conversation dated September 16, 2017, between “The Josh” and Sarah. | '''Source:''' Twitter direct-message conversation dated September 16, 2017, between “The Josh” and Sarah. | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 12 July 2026
September 16, 2017: Sarah Rejects an Allegation Involving a 14-Year-Old
In this Twitter direct-message exchange, an Onision detractor known as “The Josh” asks Sarah why she does not believe a source making an allegation about Onision.
Sarah responds:
“Because I know Greg and he would not do that. A 14 year old? He would have been disgusted.”
She then adds:
“Whoever your source is is lying to you.”
What the message directly shows: At the time of this conversation, Sarah did not merely say that she was uncertain or lacked information. She affirmatively stated that, based on personally knowing Onision, she believed he would be disgusted by the idea of sexual conduct involving a 14-year-old. She also stated that the person supplying the allegation was lying.
Why it matters: This statement was made before Sarah’s later grooming allegations. It is relevant because it shows that Sarah’s expressed view at the time was that Onision was opposed to sexual involvement with minors and would not engage in the conduct being alleged. The defense contends that this materially conflicts with the later claim that Onision was grooming or sexually targeting minors.
Source: Twitter direct-message conversation dated September 16, 2017, between “The Josh” and Sarah.