Onision/Damages - Revision history

Admin at 02:18, 31 July 2026

2026-07-31T02:18:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 30 July 2026
Line 915:		Line 915:

	Where available, the original URLs, archived copies, platform reports, account identifiers, and contemporaneous captures should be preserved alongside this composite.		Where available, the original URLs, archived copies, platform reports, account identifiers, and contemporaneous captures should be preserved alongside this composite.



			== January 9, 2020: Chris Hansen Leads a Six-Person Trespass Onto the Family's Private Property Past Posted "No Trespassing" Signs, Bringing Attorney Mike Morse, an Accused Serial Sexual Assailant ==
			[[File:2020-01-09-Chris-Hansen-Trespass-No-Trespassing-Signs-Private-Property-Six-Men.jpg\|alt=January 9, 2020 Ring camera footage showing seven individuals, including Chris Hansen, approaching the Onision family's private property past posted No Trespassing signs, with a handwritten police note referencing an Anti-Harassment Protection Order.\|thumb\|420x420px\|January 9, 2020 Ring camera footage showing Chris Hansen and six associates, including attorney Mike Morse, walking onto the family's private, HOA-governed property past multiple posted No Trespassing signs, along with the responding officer's handwritten note advising Onision to file for an Anti-Harassment Protection Order.]]
			On January 9, 2020, Ring camera footage recorded Chris Hansen and six other individuals approaching the private residential property of Onision and Lucas in Gig Harbor, Washington, walking past multiple posted "No Trespassing" and "Private Property" signs.

			=== Seven People Trespassed on Posted, HOA-Governed Private Property ===
			The footage shows seven individuals total, including Hansen, present on the private roadway leading to the family's home. The property sits within a private, HOA-governed community, meaning the road itself was private property clearly marked with both community-level and individual "No Trespassing" and "Private Property" signage. Hansen walked directly past this posted signage to approach the family's front door while his associates remained further back near the vehicles.

			== Hansen Brought Attorney Mike Morse, a Man Repeatedly Accused of Sexual Assault ==
			Among the individuals Hansen brought onto the property was attorney Mike Morse, who has been named as a defendant in at least five separate sexual assault and sexual harassment lawsuits filed by different women, including allegations of unwanted groping and touching at his own law firm's holiday parties and during personal encounters, with plaintiffs collectively seeking tens of millions of dollars in damages. Hansen, whose entire public persona is built on confronting alleged predators, brought a man carrying this documented history of sexual assault allegations to stand outside the home of a family with young children and openly discuss whether Onision, a man never charged with any crime and later vindicated by Regina & Sarah to police, was somehow a predator.

			=== Only Hansen Approached the Occupied Home ===
			Of the seven individuals present, only Hansen walked from the private community road up to the family's front door while Onision's spouse, Lucas, and their young child remained inside. The remaining six men, including Morse, stayed back near the vehicles on the private road rather than approaching the residence directly.

			=== Police Responded and Directed Onision to Pursue an Anti-Harassment Protection Order ===
			Onision contacted law enforcement, and responding officers arrived and directed Hansen to leave the property. The responding officer, identified in a handwritten note as Deputy Sheriff Decker, documented the incident under incident number 2009009013 and personally advised Onision to pursue an Anti-Harassment Protection Order against Hansen. The note includes confirmation numbers for petitions against Hansen, and directs the filing location as the Pierce County District Court. Onision followed this direct law enforcement guidance and filed for the protective order as instructed.

			=== Hansen Discussed Onision's Alleged "Predator" Status With an Accused Sexual Assailant ===
			After being told to leave by police, Hansen stood in front of the family's home and was recorded discussing his belief that Onision was a predator directly with Mike Morse, a man facing multiple pending sexual assault allegations. This is a director of a self-described predator-hunting media operation trespassing on private, posted property to stand with a man repeatedly accused of sexually assaulting women, in order to jointly declare an uncharged, unconvicted private citizen a predator, outside that citizen's home, in front of his spouse and child.

			=== This Trip Was Reportedly Financed by Anonymous Gene ===
			Anonymous Gene has separately and repeatedly claimed personal responsibility for financing Hansen's travel to confront Onision at his home, including a direct written statement that he paid for "Chris and the entire crew" to fly out and knock on the door, explicitly for the stated purpose of provoking Onision's suicide. This January 9, 2020 trespass is consistent with, and corroborates, that funding admission, connecting an unlawful trespass carried out by a media figure and an accused sexual assailant to a stalker's confessed campaign to induce a family tragedy.

			=== Legal Significance ===
			Under '''RCW 9A.52.080''', a person commits criminal trespass in the second degree by knowingly entering or remaining unlawfully on the premises of another after being informed to leave or after ignoring posted notice, including the posted "No Trespassing" signage documented in this footage. Under '''RCW 10.14.040''', a person who has been subjected to a knowing and willful course of conduct causing substantial emotional distress and serving no legitimate purpose may petition for an Anti-Harassment Protection Order, precisely the remedy the responding officer advised Onision to pursue. Hansen's continued presence and confrontational conduct after police involvement is directly relevant to establishing the pattern of harassment necessary to support that protection order.

			=== Source ===
			Ring camera footage from the Onision family residence, dated January 9, 2020. Handwritten police note provided to Onision by the responding officer, including incident number 2009009013 and Pierce County District Court filing instructions. Captured using phone camera and screen capture software.

			=== Related Evidence ===

			* [[Chris Hansen/Harassment\|Chris Hansen's Harassment Campaign]]
			* [[Chris Hansen/Grifting\|Chris Hansen's Monetization and Grifting Record]]
			* [[Anonymous Gene/Crimes\|Anonymous Gene Criminal Record]]
			* [https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.52.080 RCW 9A.52.080 - Criminal Trespass in the Second Degree]
			* [https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=10.14.040 RCW 10.14.040 - Anti-Harassment Protection Orders]
			* [https://www.deadlinedetroit.com/articles/24133/why_is_mike_morse_chasing_accused_youtube_sex_predator_onision Deadline Detroit: Why Is Mike Morse Chasing Accused YouTube Sex Predator Onision]
			* [https://www.freep.com/story/news/2018/12/05/mike-morse-law-firm-attorney/2216347002/ Detroit Free Press: Mike Morse Sexual Assault Litigation History]



	== January 15, 2020: Online Hostility Reaches the Home of Onision and Lucas ==		== January 15, 2020: Online Hostility Reaches the Home of Onision and Lucas ==

Admin at 01:53, 31 July 2026

2026-07-31T01:53:19Z

@@ Line 386: / Line 386: @@
 * [[Sarah/Assault#October 30, 2019: Sarah States No Sexual Contact Occurred Until January 17, 2019|Sarah identifies the first sexual contact]]
 * [[Sarah/Police Report|Sarah’s statements to law enforcement]]
 == November 1, 2019: CPS Formally Classifies Another Allegation Against Onision as “Unfounded” ==

Admin at 01:48, 31 July 2026

2026-07-31T01:48:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:48, 30 July 2026
Line 541:		Line 541:


	~~////~~

	== October 2019–February 2021: Regina Celebrates Onision’s Distress, Recruits Chris Hansen to Target Lucas, and Repeatedly Publishes “Pedophile” Accusations ==		== October 2019–February 2021: Regina Celebrates Onision’s Distress, Recruits Chris Hansen to Target Lucas, and Repeatedly Publishes “Pedophile” Accusations ==

Admin at 01:42, 31 July 2026

2026-07-31T01:42:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 30 July 2026
Line 539:		Line 539:
	September 17, October 4, and October 6, 2019 Twitter posts by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.		September 17, October 4, and October 6, 2019 Twitter posts by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.



			////

	== October 2019–February 2021: Regina Celebrates Onision’s Distress, Recruits Chris Hansen to Target Lucas, and Repeatedly Publishes “Pedophile” Accusations ==		== October 2019–February 2021: Regina Celebrates Onision’s Distress, Recruits Chris Hansen to Target Lucas, and Repeatedly Publishes “Pedophile” Accusations ==

Admin: /* October 11, 2022: Chris Hansen and Sarah Associate Anonymous Gene Admits Operating a Bot to Doxx and Defame the Onision Household */

2026-07-30T03:24:36Z

October 11, 2022: Chris Hansen and Sarah Associate Anonymous Gene Admits Operating a Bot to Doxx and Defame the Onision Household

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 29 July 2026
Line 1,331:		Line 1,331:

	== October 11, 2022: Chris Hansen and Sarah Associate Anonymous Gene Admits Operating a Bot to Doxx and Defame the Onision Household ==		== October 11, 2022: Chris Hansen and Sarah Associate Anonymous Gene Admits Operating a Bot to Doxx and Defame the Onision Household ==
	[[File:~~2026~~-07-~~29 20 09 24~~.jpg\|alt=October 11, 2022 Google Voice message in which Anonymous Gene states that he will leave an automated bot running while a screen capture shows residential information being published in Twitter posts concerning Onision.\|thumb\|~~793x793px~~\|October 11, 2022 communication attributed to Anonymous Gene admitting that he intended to leave an automated bot running while the system distributed residential information concerning Onision, Lucas, and their household through Twitter. The home address is redacted.]]		[[File:2022-10-11 google voice admission automated bot doxxing onision household.jpg\|alt=October 11, 2022 Google Voice message in which Anonymous Gene states that he will leave an automated bot running while a screen capture shows residential information being published in Twitter posts concerning Onision.\|thumb\|802x802px\|October 11, 2022 communication attributed to Anonymous Gene admitting that he intended to leave an automated bot running while the system distributed residential information concerning Onision, Lucas, and their household through Twitter. The home address is redacted.]]
	On October 11, 2022, criminal stalker Anonymous Gene sent Onision and Lucas a Google Voice message documenting an automated social-media system used to distribute the family's residential information.		On October 11, 2022, criminal stalker Anonymous Gene sent Onision and Lucas a Google Voice message documenting an automated social-media system used to distribute the family's residential information.

Admin at 03:18, 30 July 2026

2026-07-30T03:18:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 29 July 2026
Line 1,328:		Line 1,328:
	October 2, 2023 email from attorney Brett L. Wittner of Morton McGoldrick PLLC to Onision.		October 2, 2023 email from attorney Brett L. Wittner of Morton McGoldrick PLLC to Onision.



			== October 11, 2022: Chris Hansen and Sarah Associate Anonymous Gene Admits Operating a Bot to Doxx and Defame the Onision Household ==
			[[File:2026-07-29 20 09 24.jpg\|alt=October 11, 2022 Google Voice message in which Anonymous Gene states that he will leave an automated bot running while a screen capture shows residential information being published in Twitter posts concerning Onision.\|thumb\|793x793px\|October 11, 2022 communication attributed to Anonymous Gene admitting that he intended to leave an automated bot running while the system distributed residential information concerning Onision, Lucas, and their household through Twitter. The home address is redacted.]]
			On October 11, 2022, criminal stalker Anonymous Gene sent Onision and Lucas a Google Voice message documenting an automated social-media system used to distribute the family's residential information.

			The attached screen capture shows a Twitter account publishing material containing the home address associated with Onision, Lucas, and their children.

			Gene wrote:

			: "Im just gonna leave the bot running."

			He then asked:

			: "Just wanted to get a final spell check before I let it run. I spelled everything correctly right?"

			=== Gene Admitted Automating the Doxxing Campaign ===
			This was not a single impulsive publication.

			Gene documented a system designed to continue operating without requiring him to manually publish each post. His statement that he would leave the bot running establishes that the distribution was planned, repeatable, automated, and intended to continue.

			The automated operation allowed Gene to:

			* publish the household's residential information repeatedly
			* attach the information to discussions concerning Onision
			* reach people who encountered or interacted with Onision-related content
			* reproduce defamatory accusations at machine speed
			* expand the number of people capable of locating the family
			* continue the harassment even while Gene was not actively posting
			* multiply the reputational, financial, and safety damage caused by every publication

			Gene had already admitted publishing the family's information hundreds of times and targeting Puyallup community groups. The bot industrialized that campaign.

			=== The Bot Combined Defamation With Residential Exposure ===
			Gene's wider campaign did not distribute neutral address information.

			It paired identifying information with accusations portraying Onision and Lucas as sexual criminals and dangers to children. Those accusations were designed to make strangers fear, hate, exclude, and potentially confront the household.

			The automated system therefore combined two dangerous components:

			* inflammatory accusations intended to enrage an audience
			* residential information enabling that audience to locate the targets

			The accusations supplied the hostility.

			The address supplied the destination.

			Automating that combination substantially increased the foreseeable risk that a hostile stranger would approach, threaten, vandalize, or attack the home shared by Onision, Lucas, and their children.

			=== Direct Damage to the Household ===
			Automated doxxing magnified the harm every time the bot published or redistributed the family's information.

			The consequences included:

			* continued exposure of the family residence
			* increased risk of stalking, vandalism, confrontation, or violence
			* fear for the safety of Lucas and the children
			* reputational destruction among new audiences
			* interference with Onision's ability to earn income online
			* contamination of searches and discussions concerning Onision
			* pressure on platforms, advertisers, and business relationships
			* emotional distress caused by an automated campaign that could continue indefinitely
			* increased difficulty identifying every publication and obtaining its removal
			* loss of control over private information concerning the household

			The financial harm was not incidental. Gene's automated operation attached defamatory accusations and residential information to Onision-related activity, further damaging the reputation and audience relationships on which Onision's established online business depended.

			=== Criminal Stalking and Cyber-Harassment Evidence ===
			Gene's admission is evidence of intentional and repeated electronic communication directed at Onision, Lucas, and third parties for the purpose of harassment, intimidation, residential exposure, and reputational destruction.

			The conduct is relevant to:

			* Washington cyber harassment under RCW 9A.90.120
			* Washington stalking under RCW 9A.46.110
			* federal stalking through electronic communications under 18 U.S.C. 2261A

			RCW 9A.90.120 applies to repeated electronic communications made to a person or third party with intent to harass or intimidate under the circumstances defined by the statute.

			RCW 9A.46.110 addresses intentional and repeated harassment that causes substantial emotional distress or reasonable fear of injury to a person or property.

			18 U.S.C. 2261A applies to a course of conduct using an interactive computer service or electronic communication system with intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, or place another person under surveillance when the conduct causes, attempts to cause, or would reasonably be expected to cause substantial emotional distress or fear of serious bodily injury.

			Gene's own statement supplies direct evidence of automation, repetition, planning, control, and intent. His wider documented conduct supplies the surrounding course of stalking, threats, local targeting, residential exposure, and third-party mobilization.

			=== The Family Had a Right to Be Left Alone ===
			Onision and Lucas had the right to speak online without a criminal stalker deploying automated accounts to publish their home address.

			Their children had the right to sleep in their home without strangers being supplied with the information necessary to locate them.

			Gene deliberately transformed a defamatory online campaign into an automated system capable of endangering the household continuously.

			The bot did not merely spread speech.

			It repeatedly exposed a real family, at a real residence, to an audience Gene had worked to inflame against them.

			=== Source ===
			Google Voice communication attributed to Anonymous Gene and dated October 11, 2022.

			The attached Twitter screen capture displays the automated publication of residential information concerning the household.

			The communication was captured using a phone. The residential address and other private information are redacted.

			=== Related Evidence ===

			* [[Onision\|Onision and Lucas]]
			* [[Sarah/Defamation\|Sarah's Public Accusation Record]]
			* [[Regina\|Regina Record]]

	== May 3, 2024: Plaintiffs’ Litigation Position Is Reported as “Only Interested in Getting Money From Google” ==		== May 3, 2024: Plaintiffs’ Litigation Position Is Reported as “Only Interested in Getting Money From Google” ==

Admin at 01:47, 30 July 2026

2026-07-30T01:47:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 29 July 2026
Line 1,092:		Line 1,092:
	* [[Sarah/Police Report\|Sarah’s materially different statements to law enforcement]]		* [[Sarah/Police Report\|Sarah’s materially different statements to law enforcement]]

			== April 7, 2021: Neighborhood mail harassment campaign targeting Onision's Family Home ==
			On April 7, 2021, Onision received an email documenting a campaign to distribute accusation-based materials to people living near
			[[File:2021-04-07 email neighborhood mail campaign targeting onision and lucas.jpg\|alt=April 7, 2021 Gmail screenshot showing local addresses, mailing instructions, and a neighborhood flyer labeling Onision and Lucas predators and announcing their move to Puyallup.\|thumb\|437x437px\|April 7, 2021 email documenting a neighborhood mail campaign that labeled Onision and Lucas "predators," announced their move to Puyallup, and directed distribution of the flyer to local addresses. Personal information is redacted.]]
			the home shared by Onision, Lucas, and their children.

			The sender wrote:

			: "THIS is what is being sent to everyone"

			The email displayed apparent neighborhood addresses, instructions to print and distribute a letter, and a flyer labeling Onision and Lucas:

			: "well known predators"

			The flyer referenced the Discovery+ program ''Onision: In Real Life'' and announced:

			: "They have recently moved into the Puyallup area!!"

			=== The harassment entered the family's physical neighborhood ===
			This was not ordinary online criticism. The material was prepared for physical distribution to people living near the family residence.

			The campaign identified the community where Onision and Lucas lived, presented disputed accusations as established facts, and encouraged local distribution of the flyer. Its foreseeable effect was to expose, isolate, intimidate, and damage the reputation of the entire household within its own neighborhood.

			The resulting harm included:

			* loss of residential privacy
			* reputational damage among neighbors
			* fear of confrontation or surveillance
			* increased danger to Onision, Lucas, and their children
			* concern that strangers would approach or target the residence
			* substantial emotional distress
			* interference with the family's right to live safely and peacefully

			=== Conduct attributed to Anonymous Gene ===
			The preserved source record attributes the neighborhood mail campaign to a person using the name Anonymous Gene.

			The conduct attributed to Anonymous Gene was deliberate and invasive. It involved using residential information and physical mail to carry an accusation campaign directly to the people living around Onision and Lucas.

			The mailing repeated the same accusation narrative promoted publicly by Sarah and Regina and amplified through media coverage including ''Onision: In Real Life''. Any preserved emails, direct messages, admissions, mailing records, or communications showing Anonymous Gene's coordination with Sarah, Lisa Haba, or other campaign participants should be retained with this record.

			=== Potential stalking and harassment violations ===
			Federal stalking law, 18 U.S.C. 2261A, applies when a person uses the mail as part of a course of conduct intended to harass or intimidate and that conduct causes, attempts to cause, or would reasonably be expected to cause substantial emotional distress.

			Washington's stalking statute, RCW 9A.46.110, applies to intentional and repeated harassment that causes substantial emotional distress or places a person in fear of injury to a person or property.

			When viewed with the wider documented pattern of online targeting, residential exposure, death threats, and physical harassment, the neighborhood mailing is evidence of a coordinated course of conduct capable of supporting criminal stalking and civil-harassment claims.

			Physical mail is not a legal loophole. A law-breaker who uses neighborhood mailing lists, residential information, and inflammatory accusations to intimidate or torment a targeted family may face criminal and civil liability.

			=== Accusations presented as fact ===
			The flyer did not present its language as opinion. It categorically labeled Onision and Lucas "predators," identified their new community, invoked a commercial television program as apparent validation, and encouraged recipients to contact police.

			Accusing identifiable people of predatory or criminal conduct and distributing those accusations throughout their neighborhood creates severe reputational and safety consequences. The harm is intensified when the targets' children live at the same residence.

			=== Harm to Onision, Lucas, and their children ===
			Onision and Lucas were forced to live with the knowledge that nearby residents may have received the flyer, believed its accusations, redistributed it, watched the residence, contacted authorities, or considered confronting the family.

			The campaign attacked more than their online reputations. It interfered with their home, their community relationships, their privacy, and their ability to protect their children.

			Onision and Lucas had the right to be left alone. Their children had the right to live safely without an internet accusation campaign being delivered into their physical neighborhood.

			=== Source ===
			Gmail message dated April 7, 2021 at 1:43 a.m.

			The email and attached neighborhood-distribution materials were captured using computer screen-capture software.

			Personal names and residential information are redacted.

			=== Related evidence ===

			* [[Anonymous Gene]]
			* [[Onision/Damages\|Damage to Onision and Lucas]]
			* [[Sarah/Defamation\|Sarah's public accusations]]
			* [[Regina/Defamation\|Regina's public accusations]]
			* [[Chris Hansen]]
			* [[Lisa Haba]]

Admin: /* January 15, 2020: Online Hostility Reaches the Home of Onision and Lucas */

2026-07-30T01:10:04Z

January 15, 2020: Online Hostility Reaches the Home of Onision and Lucas

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 29 July 2026
Line 885:		Line 885:

	Ring security cameras recorded multiple vehicles and individuals at or immediately adjacent to the property. Police were called, but the individuals had already departed by the time officers arrived, and the reported property damage had already occurred.		Ring security cameras recorded multiple vehicles and individuals at or immediately adjacent to the property. Police were called, but the individuals had already departed by the time officers arrived, and the reported property damage had already occurred.
	[[File:2020-01-15 ring camera stills residential vandalism incident.jpg\|alt=Three Ring security-camera stills showing vehicles and unidentified individuals at the home of Onision and Lucas during a reported vandalism incident on January 15, 2020.\|thumb\|614x614px\|Ring security-camera stills showing ~~vehicles and~~ unidentified ~~individuals~~ at the home of Onision and Lucas during the January 15, 2020 vandalism incident. Police were called, but the individuals had left before officers arrived.]]		[[File:2020-01-15 ring camera stills residential vandalism incident.jpg\|alt=Three Ring security-camera stills showing vehicles and unidentified individuals at the home of Onision and Lucas during a reported vandalism incident on January 15, 2020.\|thumb\|614x614px\|Ring security-camera stills showing unidentified trespassers at the home of Onision and Lucas during the January 15, 2020 vandalism incident. Police were called, but the individuals had left before officers arrived.]]
	The incident occurred during the height of the public accusation campaign involving Sarah and Regina, when Onision and Lucas were being portrayed online as dangerous, abusive, predatory, and criminal.		The incident occurred during the height of the public accusation campaign involving Sarah and Regina, when Onision and Lucas were being portrayed online as dangerous, abusive, predatory, and criminal.

Admin: /* January 5, 2021: CPS Finds the Physical-Abuse Allegation Against Onision “Unfounded” */

2026-07-30T00:46:58Z

January 5, 2021: CPS Finds the Physical-Abuse Allegation Against Onision “Unfounded”

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 29 July 2026
Line 880:		Line 880:

	Where available, the original URLs, archived copies, platform reports, account identifiers, and contemporaneous captures should be preserved alongside this composite.		Where available, the original URLs, archived copies, platform reports, account identifiers, and contemporaneous captures should be preserved alongside this composite.

			== January 15, 2020: Online Hostility Reaches the Home of Onision and Lucas ==
			On January 15, 2020, unidentified individuals arrived at the home shared by Onision, Lucas, and their children during an incident reported to police as residential vandalism in a private neighborhood.

			Ring security cameras recorded multiple vehicles and individuals at or immediately adjacent to the property. Police were called, but the individuals had already departed by the time officers arrived, and the reported property damage had already occurred.
			[[File:2020-01-15 ring camera stills residential vandalism incident.jpg\|alt=Three Ring security-camera stills showing vehicles and unidentified individuals at the home of Onision and Lucas during a reported vandalism incident on January 15, 2020.\|thumb\|614x614px\|Ring security-camera stills showing vehicles and unidentified individuals at the home of Onision and Lucas during the January 15, 2020 vandalism incident. Police were called, but the individuals had left before officers arrived.]]
			The incident occurred during the height of the public accusation campaign involving Sarah and Regina, when Onision and Lucas were being portrayed online as dangerous, abusive, predatory, and criminal.

			The harassment was no longer confined to comments, videos, interviews, or social-media posts.

			Unknown individuals had located the family home, physically appeared at the property, and the residence was vandalized.

			=== The Threat Was No Longer Merely Online ===
			The importance of this incident is not limited to the cost of repairing property damage.

			It established that people motivated by the public controversy could locate and approach the residence where Onision, Lucas, and their children lived.

			That created an immediate and continuing safety risk involving:

			* strangers physically appearing at the family home
			* damage to private property
			* fear that the individuals could return
			* concern for the safety of the children
			* police involvement
			* increased monitoring of the property
			* loss of residential privacy
			* disruption of ordinary family life
			* uncertainty about whether online threats would become physical violence

			The family could no longer treat the campaign as something occurring exclusively on the internet.

			It had reached their front door.

			=== Public Disclosure of the Address Created a Concrete Danger ===
			The residence was occupied not only by Onision, but also by Lucas and their children.

			Publishing or circulating identifying information about the home therefore exposed the entire household to anyone following the controversy—including people who had publicly expressed a desire to harm or kill Onision.

			The danger was not speculative.

			The preserved record includes repeated social-media posts calling for Onision’s murder, asking other people to kill him, offering payment for his killing, or personally declaring an intention to do it.

			The January 15 incident establishes the additional physical component: unidentified people did, in fact, locate and appear at the residence.

			No completed physical attack was required before the family could reasonably fear for its safety. Once strangers had appeared at the home during a vandalism incident, the risk associated with continued disclosure of the address was obvious.

			The public campaign did not merely damage an online reputation.

			It helped create an environment in which the private family home became a target.

			=== Source ===
			Ring security-camera footage recorded January 15, 2020.

			The still images were captured through the Ring application.

			Police were called concerning the residential vandalism incident, but the individuals had departed before officers arrived.

			=== Related evidence ===

			* [[Onision/Damages#Public calls for and threats to kill Onision\|Public calls for and threats to kill Onision]]
			* [[Sarah/Defamation\|Sarah’s public accusation campaign]]
			* [[Regina/Defamation\|Regina’s public accusation campaign]]
			* [[Chris Hansen\|Media amplification of the allegations]]

Admin at 00:33, 30 July 2026

2026-07-30T00:33:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 29 July 2026
Line 849:		Line 849:
	=== Source ===		=== Source ===
	November 26, 2019 and January 20, 2020 Twitter posts by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.		November 26, 2019 and January 20, 2020 Twitter posts by Regina Alonso from the account @hahan0bye.

			== Public calls for and threats to kill Onision ==
			[[File:2019-08-13 to 2021-02-15 exhibit 01 social media posts calling for onisions death.jpg\|alt=Composite of twelve social-media posts dated from 2019 through 2021 in which users call for, solicit, endorse, or personally threaten the killing of Onision.\|thumb\|Twelve social-media posts dated August 13, 2019 through February 15, 2021 openly calling for, soliciting, endorsing, or personally threatening the killing of Onision.]]
			During the period in which allegations involving Sarah and Regina were being widely amplified, social-media users repeatedly posted public statements calling for Onision to be killed, asking other people to kill him, offering payment for his killing, or personally declaring an intention to murder him.

			The exhibit displays twelve examples dated between August 13, 2019 and February 15, 2021. Among the statements visible in the exhibit are:

			* “Is anyone gonna kill Onision or do I have to do it myself”
			* “Your first mission is to kill @Onision. Bring us his head.”
			* “if the government doesnt kill onision i will”
			* “ill pay some1 rn to kill onision”
			* “i know what i was born to do... kill onision”
			* “im going to kill onision with my own hands”
			* “Can somebody hire an assassins to kill Onision? Thanks.”
			* “i hope i get to be the one to murder onision”

			These were not merely expressions of dislike or criticism. The visible statements include personal declarations of intent, requests that another person commit murder, an apparent offer of payment, and repeated endorsements of Onision’s death.

			=== Relevance to damages and household safety ===
			Onision shared his residence with Lucas and their children. Public distribution of information identifying that residence therefore exposed the entire household—not only Onision—to a documented population of people openly expressing a desire or willingness to have him killed.

			The danger did not depend upon every poster possessing the address or ultimately attempting an attack. The posts establish that violent rhetoric had moved beyond ordinary online hostility into repeated calls for murder. Against that documented background, efforts to preserve the family’s residential privacy were reasonable and directly connected to household safety.

			The resulting harm includes fear for personal and family safety, loss of privacy, heightened security concerns, disruption of ordinary family life, and the continuing uncertainty created by not knowing whether an anonymous person making such statements might act upon them.

			=== Evidentiary scope ===
			This exhibit documents the violent public reaction occurring during the accusation campaign. It does not, by itself, establish that Sarah, Regina, or another campaign participant wrote, directed, or approved each individual post.

			Its evidentiary value is direct and limited: social-media users publicly called for, solicited, endorsed, or personally threatened Onision’s killing while allegations against Onision and Lucas were being widely circulated. That documented environment made publication of the family’s home address materially dangerous.

			Where available, the original URLs, archived copies, platform reports, account identifiers, and contemporaneous captures should be preserved alongside this composite.