Onision Wiki - Recent changes [en]

Main Page

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:28:22 GMT

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<div style="border:2px solid #111; background:#f7f7f7; padding:24px 28px; margin:0 0 28px 0; text-align:center;"><div style="font-size:0.85em; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:0.18em; text-transform:uppercase; margin-bottom:10px;">
+<div style="border:2px solid #111; background:#f7f7f7; padding:24px 28px; margin:0 0 28px 0; text-align:center;">
-First Major Page Published
-</div><div style="font-size:2em; font-weight:bold; line-height:1.2; margin-bottom:12px;">
+<div style="font-size:0.85em; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:0.18em; text-transform:uppercase; margin-bottom:10px;">
-[https://onision.wiki/index.php/Sarah/Grooming Sarah: "Grooming"]
+Major Evidence Pages Published
-</div><div style="max-width:850px; margin:0 auto 18px auto; font-size:1.05em; line-height:1.65;">
+</div>
-The first major evidence-based investigation on '''Onision Wiki''' is now available. The page examines Sarah’s grooming allegations through messages, police records, interviews, screenshots, videos, direct quotations, and other primary-source materials.
-</div><div style="max-width:850px; margin:0 auto 20px auto; line-height:1.65;">
+<div style="font-size:2em; font-weight:bold; line-height:1.2; margin-bottom:14px;">
-It documents what Sarah said at the time, how her account later changed, and why the available record supports James and Lucas’s position that the grooming narrative is false.
+The Sarah Record
-</div><div style="margin:22px 0;">
+</div>
-<span style="display:inline-block; background:#111; padding:12px 24px; font-weight:bold; font-size:1.05em;"> [[Sarah/Grooming|<span style="color:#fff;">READ SARAH: GROOMING →</span>]] </span>
-</div><div style="border-top:1px solid #bbb; max-width:760px; margin:22px auto 0 auto; padding-top:16px; font-size:0.95em;">
+<div style="max-width:850px; margin:0 auto 24px auto; font-size:1.05em; line-height:1.65;">
-'''More major pages are coming.''' Future releases will address the NDA, relationship history, legal claims, media coverage, and other widely discussed Onision controversies.
+The first major evidence-based investigations on '''Onision Wiki''' are now available. These pages examine Sarah’s allegations through contemporaneous messages, police records, signed documents, interviews, screenshots, videos, direct quotations, and other primary-source materials.
-</div><div style="margin-top:12px; font-size:0.9em;">
+</div>
-[https://onision.wiki/index.php/Special:RecentChanges View recent additions and updates]
-</div></div>
+<div style="display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:18px; justify-content:center; margin:20px auto; max-width:1000px;">
 = Onision Wiki =

Sarah/NDA

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:26:43 GMT

Show changes

Sarah/NDA

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:22:14 GMT

Created page with "=== January 7, 2019: Sarah Defines What She Wanted Before Signing the NDA === Sarah writes:<blockquote>“I’m an adult if I wanna get my shit rocked by another consenting adult there’s nothing wrong with that lol”</blockquote>She then rejects the idea that Lucas had been planning sexual activity with her while she was underage:<blockquote>“Were you plotting all along while I was underage? to wait until I was 18 to do shit with me? No. It was literally the opposit..."

New page

=== January 7, 2019: Sarah Defines What She Wanted Before Signing the NDA ===
Sarah writes:<blockquote>“I’m an adult if I wanna get my shit rocked by another consenting adult there’s nothing wrong with that lol”</blockquote>She then rejects the idea that Lucas had been planning sexual activity with her while she was underage:<blockquote>“Were you plotting all along while I was underage? to wait until I was 18 to do shit with me? No. It was literally the opposite”[[File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Defines-What-She-Wanted-Before-Signing-NDA.jpg|alt=Screenshot of January 7, 2019 messages in which Sarah says she wants consensual adult sex and denies any underage plan to wait until she turned 18.|thumb|On January 7, 2019, immediately before the NDA negotiations, Sarah described the sexual activity she wanted as consensual adult conduct and denied that Lucas had planned it while she was underage.]]</blockquote>

=== What this establishes in the NDA timeline ===
Sarah was not describing herself as someone afraid of sexual contact or being pressured into it.

She was openly expressing that:

* She wanted sexual activity.
* She considered it consensual adult conduct.
* She believed there was nothing wrong with pursuing it.
* She rejected the idea that Lucas had planned or cultivated it while she was underage.
* She understood that the sexual situation began only after she was an adult.

This message was sent one day before Sarah discussed adding a clause to the NDA, joked about her “totally professional intentions,” demanded that Onision sign, and asked what the agreement meant.

The timing matters.

The January 7 message explains '''what Sarah wanted'''. The January 8 messages show her attempting to connect that desire to the NDA negotiations. The January 18 signatures show that the agreement was executed afterward.

Months later, during her August 27 livestream, Sarah admitted that she had said:<blockquote>“Only if we do stuff will I sign the papers.”</blockquote>She also acknowledged saying she would not sign unless she:<blockquote>“got something out of it”</blockquote>and:<blockquote>“got what I wanted.”</blockquote>

=== The complete sequence ===
The relevant chronology is:

# '''January 7:''' Sarah states that she wants consensual adult sex and denies that anyone had been plotting sexual activity while she was underage.
# '''January 8:''' Sarah discusses adding a clause, jokes about her intentions, demands that Onision sign, and asks what the NDA means.
# '''January 8:''' Lucas tells Sarah that illegal conduct is not protected and that she can read the agreement.
# '''January 18:''' Sarah signs the mutual NDA.
# '''August 27:''' Sarah publicly admits that she said she would sign only if they “did stuff” and only after she “got what [she] wanted.”

=== Source ===
January 7, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.

== January 18, 2019: Sarah Signs the Mutual NDA After Saying She “Got What [She] Wanted” ==
This two-page agreement documents the mutual confidentiality and no-false-statements arrangement signed by Sarah and Onision on January 18, 2019.

The displayed agreement was not a one-sided restriction imposed only on Sarah. Both Sarah and Onision accepted confidentiality obligations, both were protected against unauthorized disclosure, and both were prohibited from making false statements about the other.

The wording of the agreement must also be read alongside the communications and events that occurred before Sarah signed it.

According to the surrounding record, Sarah actively discussed the agreement, wanted Onision legally bound by it, proposed terms for her own benefit, and asked questions about its meaning. Onision and Lucas state that Sarah then refused to sign until she first received the sexual contact she wanted, later describing the sequence as signing only after she “got what [she] wanted.”

The written agreement contains no promise of sex because the sexual condition Sarah allegedly imposed was not written as a future contractual benefit. According to Onision and Lucas, Sarah insisted on receiving it first and signed the NDA afterward.
[[File:2019-01-18-Sarah-And-Onision-Mutual-NDA-Page-1.jpg|alt=First page of a January 18, 2019 mutual NDA between Sarah and Onision showing confidentiality terms, lawful reporting exceptions, and a prohibition against false statements.|thumb|Page one of the January 18, 2019 mutual NDA between Sarah and Onision, including the lawful-disclosure exception and the provision forbidding false statements about either party.]]

=== The Agreement Was Mutual ===
The agreement identifies Sarah as the “First Party” and Onision as the “Second Party.”

Its obligations applied to both of them.

Either party could share confidential information with the other, and both parties were required to protect information they received. The contract did not grant Onision a special right to speak while silencing Sarah.

Section 2 required private information and witnessed events to remain between the parties unless both agreed that the material was no longer private.

If only one party authorized disclosure and the other did not, releasing the information would violate the agreement.

=== What the Agreement Protected ===
The agreement defined confidential information to include:

* Business plans, methods, and practices
* Personal stories
* Private information about either party
* Conversations
* Events
* Other information the parties treated as private

Section 3 required confidential material to remain the property of the person who disclosed it. It also allowed the disclosing party to request that copies be returned or destroyed.

The provision authorized legal relief if confidential information was improperly released.
[[File:2019-01-18-Sarah-And-Onision-Mutual-NDA-Signatures-Page-2.jpg|alt=Signature page of the January 18, 2019 mutual NDA showing a five-year term and signatures from Sarah and Onision.|thumb|Page two of the mutual NDA showing its five-year term and the January 18, 2019 signatures of Sarah and Onision.]]

=== The Agreement Preserved Lawful Reporting ===
Section 4 lists information that would not be treated as confidential.

Section 4(c) expressly excludes information that:<blockquote>“Is disclosed pursuant to the lawful requirement of a court or governmental agency or where required by operation of law.”</blockquote>This provision directly contradicts the later portrayal of the agreement as a document designed to conceal criminal conduct or prevent Sarah from cooperating with authorities.

The agreement did not prohibit Sarah from responding to:

* A court order
* A subpoena
* A governmental agency
* A lawful investigation
* Another disclosure required by law

[[File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Told-Mutual-NDA-Does-Not-Protect-Illegal-Conduct.jpg|alt=Screenshot of January 8, 2019 messages in which Sarah discusses an NDA clause, insists that Onision sign, asks about the agreement, and is told illegal conduct is excluded.|thumb|On January 8, 2019, Sarah negotiated the mutual NDA, demanded that Onision also sign, and was expressly told that the agreement did not protect illegal conduct.]]
Sarah was also told during the negotiations that the agreement would not protect Onision or Lucas if they were breaking the law.

The written contract and the surrounding messages therefore communicate the same basic rule: ordinary private information was protected, but lawfully required reporting was not prohibited.

=== The Agreement Prohibited False Statements ===
Section 8 states:<blockquote>“Parties are forbidden from producing false statements about one another to any third parties…”</blockquote>This was not merely a secrecy agreement. It was also a mutual no-lying agreement.

The provision protected Sarah from false statements by Onision and protected Onision from false statements by Sarah.

This section is especially important because the agreement was intended to protect the household from someone gaining access to private family information and later presenting false claims about what occurred.

=== The Agreement Created No Partnership or Relationship ===
Section 5 states that the contract did not create:

* An agency
* A partnership
* A joint venture
* Any similar formal relationship

Section 7 states that the NDA did not require either party to disclose more information, enter another agreement, or provide any additional obligation or benefit.

The written agreement therefore gave Sarah no continuing right to:

* A romantic relationship
* A sexual relationship
* Continued access to the household
* Continued contact with Onision or Lucas
* Money
* Employment
* Any other personal benefit

That absence must be understood in the correct sequence.

The surrounding communications and Sarah’s later statements indicate that she attached her own sexual condition to whether she would sign. According to Onision, Lucas & Sarah's own live stream confessions, Sarah insisted on first receiving the sexual contact she wanted and then signed the agreement after stating that she had “got what [she] wanted.”

Once signed, the NDA functioned only as a mutual confidentiality and no-false-statements agreement.

=== Sarah’s Role in Negotiating the Agreement ===
The surrounding messages show Sarah participating directly in the NDA process.

Sarah:

* Discussed adding a clause
* Said the clause was for her own “peace of mind”
* Joked about her “totally professional intentions”
* Specifically requested that Onision sign
* Said she wanted Onision bound because he had “a fat mouth”
* Asked what the agreement meant
* Was told that illegal conduct was not protected
* Was encouraged to read the agreement herself

This was not a document secretly introduced after the fact without Sarah’s knowledge.

Sarah discussed it before signing, wanted its protections applied to Onision, asked questions, received explanations, and signed the completed agreement.

=== Other Friends Signed Similar Agreements ===
Onision and Lucas have possession of documents proving other friends connected to the household signed substantially similar confidentiality agreements.

That wider use is important because it demonstrates that the agreement format was not invented uniquely for Sarah and was not sexual.

According to Onision and Lucas:

* The agreements were used to protect the household’s private information.
* Other friends signed them without demanding sex.
* Sarah was the only signer who attempted to connect her signature with sexual access to Onision and Lucas.
* Sarah signed only after she received what she later described as what she “wanted.”

The agreement itself was a household privacy measure. The sexual condition came from Sarah, not from the written contract.

=== The Agreement Lasted Five Years ===
Section 9 states that the agreement would remain in effect for five years from its effective date.

It also states that the obligation to protect confidential information already disclosed would survive the formal expiration of the agreement.

Both Sarah and Onision signed and dated the document January 18, 2019.

=== What the Signed Agreement Directly Establishes ===
The document establishes that:

* Sarah and Onision entered a written mutual confidentiality agreement.
* The obligations applied to both parties.
* Sarah was protected by the agreement as well as restricted by it.
* Disclosure required by courts, government agencies, or law remained permitted.
* False statements about either party were expressly prohibited.
* The agreement created no partnership or continuing personal relationship.
* Sarah signed and dated the agreement.
* Onision signed and dated the agreement.
* The agreement became effective January 18, 2019.
* Its stated term was five years.

=== Why It Matters ===
The signed document contradicts the portrayal of the NDA as a one-sided instrument created to silence Sarah about criminal conduct.

The complete record instead shows:

# The agreement was mutual.
# Sarah actively participated in discussing it.
# Sarah specifically wanted Onision legally bound.
# Sarah asked what the agreement meant.
# Sarah was told that illegal conduct was not protected.
# Court and governmental disclosures were expressly preserved in writing.
# False statements by either party were prohibited.
# The agreement gave Sarah no right to a relationship or future benefit.
# Onision and Lucas state that Sarah conditioned her signature on first receiving the sex she wanted.
# Sarah signed only afterward, when she said she had “got what [she] wanted.”

The written NDA did not create the sexual condition. Sarah did.

The document then served its stated purpose: protecting private household information and forbidding false statements by either party.

=== Source ===
Physical copies of the mutual nondisclosure agreements established in Gig Harbor, Washington, including the agreement signed by Sarah and Onision on January 18, 2019, together with the surrounding January 2019 communications concerning its negotiation, purpose, and signing.

=== August 27, 2019: Sarah Admits She Conditioned Signing the NDA on Sexual Access ===
[[File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Admits-Conditioning-NDA-Signature-On-Sexual-Access.jpg|alt=Screenshot of Sarah during an August 27, 2019 livestream admitting that she conditioned signing the NDA on first “doing stuff” with Onision and Lucas.|thumb|On August 27, 2019, Sarah admitted that she told Onision and Lucas she would sign the NDA only if they first engaged in sexual activity with her, then claimed the demand was a joke.]]
During a YouNow livestream, Sarah described the discussion surrounding the mutual NDA and acknowledged that she told Onision and Lucas she would sign only if they first engaged in sexual activity with her.

Sarah stated:<blockquote>“I was like, ‘only if we do stuff will I sign the papers.’”</blockquote>She then attempted to dismiss the demand by saying:<blockquote>“It was a fucking joke.”</blockquote>

=== What Sarah directly admits ===
Sarah confirms that:

* She initially resisted signing the NDA.
* She demanded a clause or condition representing something she wanted.
* She told Onision and Lucas she would sign only if they “did stuff” with her.
* The phrase “did stuff” referred to sexual activity.
* She signed the agreement after the sexual encounter occurred.
* She later claimed the condition was merely a joke.

The statement matches the surrounding January 2019 messages in which Sarah joked about her “totally professional intentions,” discussed a clause for her own benefit, and expressed her desire for sexual activity with Onision and Lucas.

=== Why it matters ===
Sarah’s own account establishes that the sexual condition came from her, not from the household.

Onision and Lucas did not place sexual access into the written NDA, promise sex in the agreement, or use the contract to obtain sexual activity from Sarah. Sarah admits that she was the person who connected her willingness to sign with first receiving the sexual activity she wanted.

Calling the demand a “joke” afterward does not erase the sequence she describes:

# Sarah said she did not want to sign.
# Sarah demanded that sexual activity occur first.
# Onision and Lucas gave Sarah what she said she wanted.
# Sarah then signed the mutual NDA.

Elsewhere in the contemporaneous record, Sarah used explicitly sexual language to describe what she wanted, including saying she wanted to get her “shit rocked.”

The evidence therefore shows Sarah negotiating for sexual access and signing only after the encounter—not Sarah being forced into sexual conduct through the NDA.

=== Source ===
August 27, 2019 YouNow livestream hosted by Sarah under the username “Sarahbear8500.”

Relevant timestamp: approximately 24:26–25:12.

Original channel: https://www.younow.com/sarahbear8500

Archived upload: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc2UDXaZzDk

=== August 27, 2019: Sarah Says She Refused to Sign Until She “Got Something Out of It” ===
[[File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Says-She-Signed-After-Getting-What-She-Wanted.jpg|alt=Screenshot of Sarah during an August 27, 2019 livestream saying she would not sign the NDA until she got something out of it and got what she wanted.|thumb|On August 27, 2019, Sarah said she refused to sign the mutual NDA unless she “got something out of it” and “got what [she] wanted,” referring to the sexual activity she had requested.]]
During the same YouNow livestream discussion of the mutual NDA, Sarah described Onision confronting her about refusing to sign.

Sarah stated:<blockquote>“Yeah basically he was like, ‘yeah you didn’t sign…’”</blockquote>She then described her own response:<blockquote>“I made jokes about not signing it unless I ‘got something out of it’ — ‘got what I wanted.’”</blockquote>Sarah added:<blockquote>“Yeah and even if I was being serious like, ‘wh eh eh.’”</blockquote>

=== What Sarah directly admits ===
Sarah acknowledges that she connected her willingness to sign the NDA with first receiving something she wanted from Onision and Lucas.

Read together with her immediately preceding admission that she said:<blockquote>“Only if we do stuff will I sign the papers,”</blockquote>the meaning is clear: Sarah was referring to the sexual activity she wanted before signing.

Her statement also matches earlier messages in which she joked about her “totally professional intentions” and separately used explicit language about wanting to get her “shit rocked.”

=== Why it matters ===
Sarah’s own account confirms the sequence:

# Sarah did not immediately sign the mutual NDA.
# Sarah said she wanted to “get something out of it.”
# Sarah identified that outcome as “what I wanted.”
# The surrounding discussion identifies what she wanted as sexual activity with Onision and Lucas.
# Sarah signed the agreement afterward.

Sarah later attempted to minimize the demand as a joke. However, her own retelling repeatedly links signing the NDA to receiving the sexual outcome she wanted first.

The sexual condition did not come from the written agreement or from Onision and Lucas. Sarah introduced it herself and then signed after the condition she described had been satisfied.

=== Source ===
August 27, 2019 YouNow livestream hosted by Sarah under the username “Sarahbear8500.”

Relevant timestamp: approximately 25:40–26:09.

Original channel:

<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>https://www.younow.com/sarahbear8500</nowiki>

Archived upload:

<nowiki> </nowiki><nowiki>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dc2UDXaZzDk</nowiki>

File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Defines-What-She-Wanted-Before-Signing-NDA.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:20:19 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Defines-What-She-Wanted-Before-Signing-NDA.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah describes wanting consensual adult sexual activity and rejects the idea that Lucas had been plotting sexual conduct with her while she was underage.

File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Says-She-Signed-After-Getting-What-She-Wanted.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:12:46 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Says-She-Signed-After-Getting-What-She-Wanted.jpg

New page

Screenshot from an August 27, 2019 YouNow livestream in which Sarah says she joked about refusing to sign the mutual NDA unless she “got something out of it” and “got what [she] wanted,” referring in the surrounding discussion to sexual activity with Onision and Lucas.

File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Admits-Conditioning-NDA-Signature-On-Sexual-Access.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 02:09:02 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Admits-Conditioning-NDA-Signature-On-Sexual-Access.jpg

New page

Screenshot from an August 27, 2019 YouNow livestream in which Sarah admits telling Onision and Lucas that she would sign the NDA only if they first “did stuff” with her, before claiming that the demand was a joke.

File:2019-01-18-Sarah-And-Onision-Mutual-NDA-Signatures-Page-2.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:50:45 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-18-Sarah-And-Onision-Mutual-NDA-Signatures-Page-2.jpg

New page

Second page of the January 18, 2019 mutual nondisclosure agreement showing its five-year duration and the dated signatures and printed names of Sarah and Onision.

File:2019-01-18-Sarah-And-Onision-Mutual-NDA-Page-1.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:50:16 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-18-Sarah-And-Onision-Mutual-NDA-Page-1.jpg

New page

First page of the January 18, 2019 mutual nondisclosure agreement signed by Sarah and Onision. The document defines confidential information, creates mutual confidentiality duties, prohibits unauthorized disclosure, preserves disclosures required by courts or government agencies, disclaims any partnership or additional obligation, and prohibits false statements to third parties.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:47:39 GMT

January 8, 2019: Sarah Is Told the Mutual NDA Does Not Protect Illegal Conduct

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 12 July 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 115:		Line 115:

	Text-message exchange dated October 1, 2018, involving Sarah, Lucas, and James.		Text-message exchange dated October 1, 2018, involving Sarah, Lucas, and James.

	~~== January 2019: Sarah Requests That James Sign the NDA ==~~
	~~In this text-message exchange, Sarah actively discusses the proposed nondisclosure agreement and specifically says she needs James to sign one.~~
	[[File:2019-01-Sarah-Requests-James-Sign-Mutual-NDA.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of January 2019 messages in which Sarah requests that James sign a mutual NDA, discusses adding a clause, and says she wants him bound because he has “a fat mouth.”\|thumb\|In January 2019, Sarah requested that James sign an NDA because he had “a fat mouth,” discussed adding a clause for her own peace of mind, and was told James wanted the agreement to be mutual.]]
	~~Sarah writes:~~

	~~“I think we should definitely think about adding that clause in there. You know... just for my peace of mind.”~~

	~~She then jokes:~~

	~~“totally professional intentions with this contract of course”~~

	~~Sarah later states:~~

	~~“but fr tho I need at least Greg to sign one bc he’s got a fat mouth”~~

	~~Lucas responds that it was James’s idea for the agreement to be mutual.~~

	~~'''What the messages directly show'''~~

	Sarah was not passively presented with an agreement she knew nothing about. She participated in discussing its terms, wanted a particular clause added, and specifically requested that James sign because she was concerned he might reveal private information.

	~~The exchange also shows that James proposed a mutual agreement, meaning the confidentiality obligations were intended to apply to both sides.~~

	~~'''Why it matters'''~~

	These messages directly contradict the later portrayal of the NDA as something created only by James and Lucas to silence Sarah. Sarah’s own words show that she wanted the agreement, discussed its contents, requested protection for her own “peace of mind,” and specifically wanted James legally bound to confidentiality.

	~~The contemporaneous record shows Sarah treating the NDA as a mutual arrangement that would protect her as well.~~

	~~'''Source'''~~

	~~January 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas.~~


	== January 7, 2019: Sarah Says She Would Have Realized It by Now If Lucas Were Grooming Her ==		== January 7, 2019: Sarah Says She Would Have Realized It by Now If Lucas Were Grooming Her ==
	[[File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Would-Have-Realized-If-Lucas-Were-Grooming-Her.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 message in which Sarah says she would have realized by then if Lucas were grooming her.\|thumb\|On January 7, 2019, Sarah told Lucas that if he were grooming her, she would have already figured it out by then.]]		[[File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Would-Have-Realized-If-Lucas-Were-Grooming-Her.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 message in which Sarah says she would have realized by then if Lucas were grooming her.\|thumb\|On January 7, 2019, Sarah told Lucas that if he were grooming her, she would have already figured it out by then.]]
Line 315:		Line 280:
	January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.		January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.

	~~== January 8, 2019: Sarah Is Told the Mutual NDA Does Not Protect Illegal Conduct ==~~
	~~In this exchange, Sarah asks Lucas what the proposed mutual nondisclosure agreement would prevent her from discussing.~~

	Sarah asks:<blockquote>“So like what does it mean exactly?”</blockquote>She ~~then~~ asks whether ~~she~~ would ~~still be permitted to speak~~ with her sister.		== January 8, 2019: Sarah Helps Negotiate the Mutual NDA, Requests That James Sign, and Is Informed It Does Not Protect Illegal Conduct ==
			In this text-message exchange, Sarah actively participates in discussing the proposed mutual nondisclosure agreement. She talks about adding a clause, requests that James be required to sign, asks what the agreement means, and is informed that it does not prohibit disclosure of illegal conduct.
			[[File:2019-01-Sarah-Requests-James-Sign-Mutual-NDA.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of January 2019 messages in which Sarah requests that James sign a mutual NDA, discusses adding a clause, and says she wants him bound because he has “a fat mouth.”\|thumb\|In January 2019, Sarah requested that James sign an NDA because he had “a fat mouth,” discussed adding a clause for her own peace of mind, and was told James wanted the agreement to be mutual.]]
			Sarah writes:<blockquote>“I think we should definitely think about adding that clause in there. You know... just for my peace of mind.”</blockquote>She then sarcastically comments:<blockquote>“totally professional intentions with this contract of course”</blockquote>Sarah later states:<blockquote>“but fr tho I need at least Greg to sign one bc he’s got a fat mouth”</blockquote>Lucas responds:<blockquote>“Yeah it was his idea to have a mutual one”</blockquote>Sarah then asks:<blockquote>“So like what does it mean exactly?”</blockquote>She also asks whether the agreement would prevent her from speaking with her sister.

	Lucas explains:<blockquote>“Basically we can’t talk to anyone about our interactions or any information you learned from us etc unless we are breaking the law”</blockquote>Lucas also tells Sarah that she can read the agreement herself before signing it.		Lucas explains:<blockquote>“Basically we can’t talk to anyone about our interactions or any information you learned from us etc unless we are breaking the law”</blockquote>Lucas also tells Sarah that she can read the agreement herself before signing it.

	~~'''~~What the messages directly show~~'''~~		=== What the messages directly show ===
			Sarah was not unexpectedly presented with an agreement she knew nothing about. She actively discussed its terms, proposed adding a clause, asked questions about its meaning, and specifically requested that James be legally bound by it.
	Sarah was ~~informed during the NDA discussion that the~~ agreement ~~did not prevent disclosure of illegal conduct~~. ~~Lucas expressly distinguished ordinary private information from conduct involving~~ a ~~violation of law~~.

	The exchange also ~~shows~~ that ~~Sarah was asking questions about~~ the agreement~~, receiving explanations, and being given an opportunity~~ to ~~read its terms before signing~~.		The exchange also establishes that the agreement was intended to be mutual. James proposed that both sides be subject to confidentiality rather than imposing a one-sided restriction on Sarah.

	~~'''Why it matters'''~~		Most importantly, Sarah was expressly told that the NDA did not protect illegal conduct. Lucas clearly distinguished ordinary private information from actions involving a violation of law.

	~~This conversation directly contradicts~~ the later portrayal of the NDA as an agreement ~~intended~~ to conceal ~~crimes or prevent Sarah from reporting illegal~~ conduct.		=== Why it matters ===
			These messages contradict the later portrayal of the NDA as a one-sided agreement created by James and Lucas to silence Sarah or conceal criminal conduct.

	~~The contemporaneous record shows~~ that ~~Sarah was specifically told the opposite~~: ~~the confidentiality obligations did not apply if James or Lucas were breaking the law.~~		Sarah’s own messages show that:

	~~Combined with Sarah’s request~~ that James sign the agreement~~, her participation in discussing its terms, and~~ the ~~mutual nature of~~ the NDA~~, this exchange shows that the agreement was being presented as protection for everyone’s private information rather than as a device for silencing reports of criminal activity~~.		* She participated in negotiating the agreement.
			* She wanted a clause added for her own benefit.
			* She specifically demanded that James sign.
			* She understood that the agreement would apply to both sides.
			* She asked questions before signing.
			* She was encouraged to read the document herself.
			* She was told that illegal conduct was not protected by the NDA.

	~~'''Source'''~~		The contemporaneous record shows Sarah treating the NDA as a mutual privacy agreement that would protect her interests as well as those of James and Lucas. It does not show her being deceived about the agreement’s purpose or being told that she could not report unlawful conduct.

			=== Source ===
	January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.		January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.

Main Page

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:32:01 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 12 July 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div style="border:2px solid #111; background:#f7f7f7; padding:24px 28px; margin:0 0 28px 0; text-align:center;"><div style="font-size:0.85em; font-weight:bold; letter-spacing:0.18em; text-transform:uppercase; margin-bottom:10px;">
			First Major Page Published
			</div><div style="font-size:2em; font-weight:bold; line-height:1.2; margin-bottom:12px;">
			[https://onision.wiki/index.php/Sarah/Grooming Sarah: "Grooming"]
			</div><div style="max-width:850px; margin:0 auto 18px auto; font-size:1.05em; line-height:1.65;">
			The first major evidence-based investigation on '''Onision Wiki''' is now available. The page examines Sarah’s grooming allegations through messages, police records, interviews, screenshots, videos, direct quotations, and other primary-source materials.
			</div><div style="max-width:850px; margin:0 auto 20px auto; line-height:1.65;">
			It documents what Sarah said at the time, how her account later changed, and why the available record supports James and Lucas’s position that the grooming narrative is false.
			</div><div style="margin:22px 0;">
			<span style="display:inline-block; background:#111; padding:12px 24px; font-weight:bold; font-size:1.05em;"> [[Sarah/Grooming\|<span style="color:#fff;">READ SARAH: GROOMING →</span>]] </span>
			</div><div style="border-top:1px solid #bbb; max-width:760px; margin:22px auto 0 auto; padding-top:16px; font-size:0.95em;">
			'''More major pages are coming.''' Future releases will address the NDA, relationship history, legal claims, media coverage, and other widely discussed Onision controversies.
			</div><div style="margin-top:12px; font-size:0.9em;">
			[https://onision.wiki/index.php/Special:RecentChanges View recent additions and updates]
			</div></div>

	= Onision Wiki =		= Onision Wiki =
	'''Documenting the claims. Preserving the evidence. Restoring the complete record.'''		'''Documenting the claims. Preserving the evidence. Restoring the complete record.'''

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:17:39 GMT

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-=== September 16, 2017: Sarah Rejects an Allegation Involving a 14-Year-Old ===
+== September 2016: Sarah Told Police That Nothing Sexual Occurred During Her First Trip to Washington ==
 [[File:2017-09-16-Sarah-Rejects-Grooming-Allegation.jpg|alt=Screenshot of a September 16, 2017 Twitter conversation in which Sarah says Greg would have been disgusted by conduct involving a 14-year-old and calls the allegation false.|thumb|In a September 16, 2017 Twitter exchange, Sarah stated that Greg would have been “disgusted” by conduct involving a 14-year-old and said the person making the allegation was lying.]]
 In this Twitter direct-message exchange, an Onision detractor known as “The Josh” asks Sarah why she does not believe a source making an allegation about Onision.
@@ Line 11: / Line 76: @@
 [[File:2018-10-01-Sarah-Acknowledges-Lucas-Did-Not-Return-Romantic-Feelings.jpg|alt=Screenshot of an October 1, 2018 message in which Sarah says Lucas does not have romantic feelings for her and that she had known for two years nothing would happen.|thumb|In an October 1, 2018 message, Sarah acknowledges that Lucas did not return her romantic feelings and says she had known for two years that a relationship would not happen.]]
-=== October 1, 2018: Sarah Describes Unreciprocated Romantic Feelings Toward Lucas ===
+== October 1, 2018: Sarah Describes Unreciprocated Romantic Feelings Toward Lucas ==
 In this message, sent after Sarah had turned 18, Sarah tells Lucas that she understands he does not have romantic feelings for her.

File:2017-02-Sarah-Tells-Police-No-Sexual-Contact-With-James-Or-Lucas.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:15:03 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2017-02-Sarah-Tells-Police-No-Sexual-Contact-With-James-Or-Lucas.jpg

New page

Excerpt from a Pierce County Sheriff incident report stating that Sarah lived with James and Lucas from October 2016 until February 2017 and told police she had no sexual contact with either of them during that period.

File:2016-09-Sarah-Tells-Police-Nothing-Sexual-Occurred-During-First-Washington-Visit.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:11:54 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2016-09-Sarah-Tells-Police-Nothing-Sexual-Occurred-During-First-Washington-Visit.jpg

New page

Excerpt from a Pierce County Sheriff incident report stating that Sarah traveled to Washington at age 16, stayed with James and Lucas for approximately five or six days, and told police that nothing of a sexual nature occurred during the visit.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:09:43 GMT

Show changes

File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Says-James-Immediately-Kicked-Her-Out-After-Inappropriate-Comment.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 01:00:16 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Says-James-Immediately-Kicked-Her-Out-After-Inappropriate-Comment.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a December 24, 2019 Newsweek interview in which Sarah says she brought up a prior comment about her body, James became upset, yelled at her, and immediately kicked her out.

File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Confirms-She-Strongly-Disliked-James.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:57:15 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Confirms-She-Strongly-Disliked-James.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a December 24, 2019 Newsweek interview in which Sarah says she strongly disliked James, describes him as mean, and confirms that his behavior made him emotionally and romantically unappealing to her.

File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Confirms-Removal-After-Her-Feelings-For-Lucas-Were-Discovered.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:52:48 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Confirms-Removal-After-Her-Feelings-For-Lucas-Were-Discovered.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a December 24, 2019 Newsweek interview in which Sarah acknowledges having a crush on Lucas and says she was required to leave the household after Lane revealed that something was occurring.

File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Says-She-Was-Required-To-Leave-After-Crush-On-Lucas-Became-Public.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:49:46 GMT

Admin deleted page File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Says-She-Was-Required-To-Leave-After-Crush-On-Lucas-Became-Public.jpg inaccurate

File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Says-She-Was-Required-To-Leave-After-Crush-On-Lucas-Became-Public.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:44:33 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Says-She-Was-Required-To-Leave-After-Crush-On-Lucas-Became-Public.jpg

New page

File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Describes-James-As-Hostile-Rather-Than-Romantic.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:41:45 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-12-24-Sarah-Describes-James-As-Hostile-Rather-Than-Romantic.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a December 24, 2019 Newsweek interview in which Sarah says James insulted her, called her degrading names, and made her feel unintelligent and unattractive.

File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Denies-Sexual-Relationship-Before-Age-18.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:37:12 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-08-27-Sarah-Denies-Sexual-Relationship-Before-Age-18.jpg

New page

Screenshot from an August 27, 2019 YouNow livestream interview in which Sarah is asked whether she had a sexual relationship with James or Lucas before turning 18 and repeatedly answers no.

File:2019-06-13-Sarah-Reaffirms-Lucas-Did-Not-Try-To-Groom-Her.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:33:24 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-06-13-Sarah-Reaffirms-Lucas-Did-Not-Try-To-Groom-Her.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a June 13, 2019 text message in which Sarah tells Lucas that she did not believe he tried to groom her and states that she still stood by that conclusion.

File:2019-06-13-Sarah-Admits-Hiding-Romantic-Feelings-Because-James-Would-Kick-Her-Out.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:30:51 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-06-13-Sarah-Admits-Hiding-Romantic-Feelings-Because-James-Would-Kick-Her-Out.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a June 13, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah admits that she lied about liking Lucas and concealed her feelings because she believed James would kick her out if he learned about them.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:28:54 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 12 July 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 177:		Line 177:

	January 7, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.		January 7, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.


			== January 7, 2019: Liz Rejects the Grooming Accusation Based on What She Observed ==
			In this Instagram message, a woman identified in the exhibit as Liz responds to accusations that Lucas groomed Sarah.
			[[File:2019-01-07-Liz-Says-Grooming-Accusation-Contradicts-Lucas-Behavior-With-Sarah.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 Instagram message in which Liz says the grooming accusation does not match how Lucas acted with Sarah.\|thumb\|On January 7, 2019, Liz stated that the grooming accusation against Lucas was “not even close” to how she had observed him behave with Sarah.]]
			Liz writes:<blockquote>“I’m so sorry you’re being accused of grooming.”</blockquote>She then states:<blockquote>“That’s so gross and not even close to how you act with Sarah.”</blockquote>Liz also adds:<blockquote>“Kind of why I tried to warn you.”</blockquote>'''What the messages directly show'''

			Liz rejected the grooming accusation and stated that it did not resemble the way she had personally observed Lucas behaving with Sarah.

			Her message is relevant because it comes from someone who knew Sarah in person and was present around the household during a relevant period. Rather than describing behavior she considered predatory or inappropriate, Liz said the accusation was “not even close” to Lucas’s actual conduct toward Sarah.

			'''Why it matters'''

			Liz’s statement provides contemporaneous third-party support for the Onision household’s account. It shows that someone familiar with the relationship did not interpret the Onision household’s behavior toward Sarah as grooming and believed the later accusation was inconsistent with what she had observed firsthand.

			The message also aligns with Sarah’s own repeated statements from the same period that the Onision household was innocent and had not groomed her.

			'''Source'''

			Instagram direct-message exchange dated January 7, 2019, from the account “vulkenpunch,” preserved within a text-message conversation between Sarah and Lucas.

	== January 8, 2019: Sarah Says Lucas Is Innocent and Is Not a Groomer ==		== January 8, 2019: Sarah Says Lucas Is Innocent and Is Not a Groomer ==
Line 277:		Line 297:
	January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.		January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.

	== ~~January 7~~, 2019: ~~Liz Rejects~~ the Grooming ~~Accusation Based on What She Observed~~ ==		== April 17, 2019: Archived Livestream Screenshot Shows Billie Rejecting the Grooming Claim ==
	~~In this Instagram message, a woman identified in the exhibit as Liz responds to accusations that Lucas groomed Sarah.~~		[[File:2019-04-17-Email-Preserves-Billie-No-Grooming-Statement.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of an April 17, 2019 email forwarding an archived YouNow image in which Billie says no one was grooming Sarah.\|thumb\|On April 17, 2019, James received an email preserving Billie’s statement that no one was grooming Sarah.]]
	[[File:2019-~~01-07~~-~~Liz~~-~~Says~~-~~Grooming~~-~~Accusation~~-~~Contradicts~~-~~Lucas-Behavior-With~~-~~Sarah~~.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of ~~a January 7~~, 2019 ~~Instagram message~~ in which ~~Liz~~ says ~~the~~ grooming ~~accusation does not match how Lucas acted with~~ Sarah.\|thumb\|On ~~January 7~~, 2019, ~~Liz stated~~ that ~~the~~ grooming ~~accusation against Lucas was “not even close” to how she had observed him behave with~~ Sarah.]]		On April 17, 2019, James received an email titled “Evidence against grooming allegations.” The sender explained that, while reviewing one of Sarah’s older YouNow livestreams, they discovered a chat message posted by Billie Dawn Webb.
	~~Liz writes:<blockquote>“I’m so sorry you’re being accused of~~ grooming.”~~</blockquote>She then states:<blockquote>“That’s so gross and not even close to how you act with Sarah.”</blockquote>Liz also adds:<blockquote>“Kind~~ of ~~why I tried to warn you~~.~~”</blockquote>'''What the messages directly show'''~~

	~~Liz rejected the~~ grooming ~~accusation and stated that it did~~ not ~~resemble~~ the ~~way she had personally observed Lucas behaving with Sarah.~~		Billie wrote:<blockquote>“Guys, no one is grooming Sarah. 100% not a thing”</blockquote>'''What the evidence directly shows'''

	~~Her message is relevant because it comes from someone who knew~~ Sarah ~~in person and~~ was ~~present around~~ the ~~household during a relevant period. Rather than describing behavior she considered predatory~~ or inappropriate~~, Liz said the accusation~~ was ~~“not even close” to Lucas’s actual conduct toward~~ Sarah.		Billie publicly and unequivocally rejected the claim that Sarah was being groomed. She did not describe the situation as uncertain or potentially inappropriate. She stated that no one was grooming Sarah and emphasized that it was “100% not a thing.”

	'''Why it matters'''		'''Why it matters'''

	~~Liz’s~~ statement ~~provides contemporaneous third-party support for~~ the ~~Onision household’s account~~. ~~It shows~~ that someone familiar with the ~~relationship did not interpret~~ the ~~Onision household’s behavior toward~~ Sarah as grooming and ~~believed~~ the ~~later accusation~~ was ~~inconsistent with what she had observed firsthand~~.		Billie’s statement is relevant because she was publicly defending the relationship before the later grooming narrative became widely established. Her words show that someone familiar with Sarah and the surrounding events rejected the accusation completely.
			[[File:Billie-Says-No-One-Was-Grooming-Sarah-YouNow-Screenshot.jpg\|alt=Screenshot from Sarah’s YouNow livestream showing Billie stating that no one was grooming Sarah and that it was “100% not a thing.”\|thumb\|In an archived screenshot from Sarah’s YouNow livestream, Billie stated, “Guys, no one is grooming Sarah. 100% not a thing.”]]
			The April 17, 2019 email also documents how the screenshot was located and preserved. The sender identified Sarah’s older YouNow livestream as the source and forwarded the image to James.

	~~The message also aligns with Sarah’s own repeated statements from the same period that the Onision household was innocent and had not groomed her.~~		'''Source'''

	~~'''Source'''~~		Email received by James on April 17, 2019, containing an archived screenshot from a YouNow livestream hosted by Sarah under the username “Sarahbear8500.”

	~~Instagram direct-message exchange dated January 7, 2019, from the account “vulkenpunch,” preserved within a text-message conversation between Sarah and Lucas~~.		Original channel: https://www.younow.com/sarahbear85000

File:Billie-Says-No-One-Was-Grooming-Sarah-YouNow-Screenshot.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:27:03 GMT

Admin uploaded File:Billie-Says-No-One-Was-Grooming-Sarah-YouNow-Screenshot.jpg

New page

Archived screenshot from a YouNow livestream hosted by Sarah in which the account identified as Billie Dawn Webb states, “Guys, no one is grooming Sarah. 100% not a thing.”

File:2019-04-17-Email-Preserves-Billie-No-Grooming-Statement.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:26:33 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-04-17-Email-Preserves-Billie-No-Grooming-Statement.jpg

New page

Screenshot of an April 17, 2019 email sent to James titled “Evidence against grooming allegations,” explaining that Billie’s statement was found while reviewing one of Sarah’s older YouNow livestreams and attaching the screenshot.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:19:29 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:19, 12 July 2026
Line 209:		Line 209:
	January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.		January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.

			== January 8, 2019: Sarah Introduces Sexual Terms While Negotiating the NDA ==
			In this exchange, Sarah discusses adding a clause to the proposed mutual NDA. In the surrounding conversation, the clause concerns Sarah’s desire to have sexual contact with James and Lucas.
			[[File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Told-Mutual-NDA-Does-Not-Protect-Illegal-Conduct.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of January 8, 2019 messages in which Sarah asks about the mutual NDA and Lucas explains that it does not protect conduct involving a violation of law.\|thumb\|On January 8, 2019, Sarah was told that the mutual NDA did not prevent disclosure of illegal conduct and was encouraged to read the agreement before signing it.]]
			Sarah writes:<blockquote>“I think we should definitely think about adding that clause in there. You know...just for my peace of mind”</blockquote>She then sarcastically adds:<blockquote>“totally professional intentions with this contract of course”</blockquote>Sarah also insists that James sign the agreement:<blockquote>“but fr tho I need at least Greg to sign one bc he’s got a fat mouth”</blockquote>Lucas responds:<blockquote>“Yeah it was his idea to have a mutual one”</blockquote>'''What the messages directly show'''

			Sarah actively participated in negotiating the NDA before it was signed. She proposed adding a clause connected to the sexual activity she wanted, joked openly about the nonprofessional nature of her intentions, and demanded that James also be legally bound by the agreement.

			The sexual condition originated with Sarah. James and Lucas were not using the NDA to introduce sex into the relationship and they were having their 4 other friends sign the exact same agreement as well; Sarah was attempting to connect her own desired sexual activity to the terms under which she would sign.

			'''Why it matters'''

			This exchange directly contradicts the later portrayal of Sarah as a passive or coerced party who was unexpectedly forced to sign an NDA designed to conceal unwanted sexual conduct.

			The contemporaneous messages show Sarah negotiating from a distance before signing, proposing sexual terms for her own benefit, requesting confidentiality for her own “peace of mind,” and requiring that James sign because she feared he might disclose private information.

			The record therefore shows Sarah using the NDA to facilitate and protect sexual activity she wanted, not James or Lucas using it to silence her about conduct she opposed. Later filings similarly describe Sarah as conditioning her signature on receiving what she wanted and being permitted to “do stuff” with James and Lucas.

			'''Source'''

			January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.

			== January 8, 2019: Sarah Is Told the Mutual NDA Does Not Protect Illegal Conduct ==
			In this exchange, Sarah asks Lucas what the proposed mutual nondisclosure agreement would prevent her from discussing.

			Sarah asks:<blockquote>“So like what does it mean exactly?”</blockquote>She then asks whether she would still be permitted to speak with her sister.

			Lucas explains:<blockquote>“Basically we can’t talk to anyone about our interactions or any information you learned from us etc unless we are breaking the law”</blockquote>Lucas also tells Sarah that she can read the agreement herself before signing it.

			'''What the messages directly show'''

			Sarah was informed during the NDA discussion that the agreement did not prevent disclosure of illegal conduct. Lucas expressly distinguished ordinary private information from conduct involving a violation of law.

			The exchange also shows that Sarah was asking questions about the agreement, receiving explanations, and being given an opportunity to read its terms before signing.

			'''Why it matters'''

			This conversation directly contradicts the later portrayal of the NDA as an agreement intended to conceal crimes or prevent Sarah from reporting illegal conduct.

			The contemporaneous record shows that Sarah was specifically told the opposite: the confidentiality obligations did not apply if James or Lucas were breaking the law.

			Combined with Sarah’s request that James sign the agreement, her participation in discussing its terms, and the mutual nature of the NDA, this exchange shows that the agreement was being presented as protection for everyone’s private information rather than as a device for silencing reports of criminal activity.

			'''Source'''

			January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.

	== January 8, 2019: Sarah Says Cuddling With Lucas Did Not Occur Until She Was 18 ==		== January 8, 2019: Sarah Says Cuddling With Lucas Did Not Occur Until She Was 18 ==

File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Told-Mutual-NDA-Does-Not-Protect-Illegal-Conduct.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:14:41 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Told-Mutual-NDA-Does-Not-Protect-Illegal-Conduct.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 8, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah asks what the mutual NDA means and Lucas explains that private interactions cannot be disclosed unless James or Lucas are breaking the law.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:12:32 GMT

@@ Line 209: / Line 209: @@
 January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.
-=== January 7, 2019: Liz Rejects the Grooming Accusation Based on What She Observed ===
 In this Instagram message, a woman identified in the exhibit as Liz responds to accusations that Lucas groomed Sarah.
 [[File:2019-01-07-Liz-Says-Grooming-Accusation-Contradicts-Lucas-Behavior-With-Sarah.jpg|alt=Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 Instagram message in which Liz says the grooming accusation does not match how Lucas acted with Sarah.|thumb|On January 7, 2019, Liz stated that the grooming accusation against Lucas was “not even close” to how she had observed him behave with Sarah.]]

File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Says-Cuddling-With-Lucas-Did-Not-Occur-Until-Age-18.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:11:36 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Says-Cuddling-With-Lucas-Did-Not-Occur-Until-Age-18.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 8, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah says she sent a joke Squidward meme, states that cuddling with Lucas did not happen until she was 18, and sarcastically mocks the idea that ordinary cuddling constitutes grooming.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:09:30 GMT

@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 January 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas.
 == January 7, 2019: Sarah Swears She Was Not Groomed ==
@@ Line 187: / Line 208: @@
 January 8, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.

File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Would-Have-Realized-If-Lucas-Were-Grooming-Her.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:09:02 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Would-Have-Realized-If-Lucas-Were-Grooming-Her.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah tells Lucas that if he were grooming her, she would have already figured it out by then.

File:2019-01-07-Liz-Says-Grooming-Accusation-Contradicts-Lucas-Behavior-With-Sarah.jpg

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:04:41 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-07-Liz-Says-Grooming-Accusation-Contradicts-Lucas-Behavior-With-Sarah.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 conversation containing an Instagram message from Liz in which she apologizes to Lucas for the grooming accusation and says it is “not even close” to how he acted with Sarah.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Mon, 13 Jul 2026 00:02:41 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 12 July 2026
Line 134:		Line 134:

	January 7, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.		January 7, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and captured on a MacBook.

			== January 7, 2019: Sarah Says She Recognized Grooming at Age 11 and That Lucas Did Not Groom Her ==
			[[File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Recognized-Grooming-And-Lucas-Did-Not-Groom-Her.jpg\|alt=Screenshot of January 7, 2019 messages in which Sarah says Lucas did not groom her, describes reporting an attempted groomer when she was 11, and says people distort innocent events.\|thumb\|On January 7, 2019, Sarah stated that Lucas did not groom her, said she had recognized and reported an attempted groomer at age 11, and accused outsiders of twisting innocent events.]]
			In this message to Lucas, Sarah states that she had previously recognized an actual grooming attempt when she was 11 years old and responded by fighting back and contacting police. On January 7, 2019, Sarah stated that Lucas did not groom her, said she had recognized and reported an attempted groomer at age 11, and accused outsiders of twisting innocent events.

			Sarah writes:<blockquote>“You didn’t groom me. I had a grown ass man attempt to actually groom me when I was 11 and once I caught on to what he was doing I clawed the fuck out of him and told the police. I don’t get groomed.”</blockquote>She then says that Ayalla had attempted to pursue her while she was underage and criticizes outsiders for inventing or distorting private events:<blockquote>“Nobody knows our business they just make shit up or take something that was innocent and twist it to fit their narrative.”</blockquote>'''What the messages directly show''' '''On January 7, 2019, Sarah stated that Lucas did not groom her, said she had recognized and reported an attempted groomer at age 11, and accused outsiders of twisting innocent events.'''

			Sarah explicitly states that Lucas did not groom her. She also presents herself as someone who already understood grooming from a prior experience, recognized it at a young age, resisted it, and reported it to police.

			Sarah does not describe herself as confused about the meaning of grooming. She distinguishes Lucas from a person she says actually attempted to groom her and states plainly, “I don’t get groomed.”

			'''Why it matters'''

			This message sharply contradicts Sarah’s later claim that Lucas groomed her.

			It is especially significant because Sarah does not merely deny the accusation. She explains that she had prior firsthand experience identifying grooming, understood what the conduct looked like, and believed Lucas had not done it.

			Her statement that outsiders “make shit up” or twist innocent events to fit a narrative also shows that, at the time, Sarah believed the grooming story was being imposed on the relationship by other people rather than describing what she believed had actually happened.

			'''Source'''

			January 7, 2019 text-message exchange between Sarah and Lucas, displayed from an iPhone conversation and photographed using an iPhone camera.

	== January 8, 2019: Sarah Says Lucas Is Innocent and Is Not a Groomer ==		== January 8, 2019: Sarah Says Lucas Is Innocent and Is Not a Groomer ==

File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Recognized-Grooming-And-Lucas-Did-Not-Groom-Her.jpg

Admin — Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:57:36 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Recognized-Grooming-And-Lucas-Did-Not-Groom-Her.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah says Lucas did not groom her, states that she recognized and reported an attempted groomer when she was 11, and says outsiders twist innocent events to fit their narrative.

Sarah/Grooming

Admin — Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:55:04 GMT

Show changes

File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Was-Not-Groomed-And-Calls-Accusation-Insulting.jpg

Admin — Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:51:03 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Says-She-Was-Not-Groomed-And-Calls-Accusation-Insulting.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah says she would have raised grooming during a major argument if she believed it had occurred, states “I’m not groomed,” and calls another person’s attempt to label her as groomed insulting.

File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Says-Lucas-Is-Innocent-And-Not-A-Groomer.jpg

Admin — Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:48:22 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-08-Sarah-Says-Lucas-Is-Innocent-And-Not-A-Groomer.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 8, 2019 text-message exchange in which Sarah tells Lucas that he is innocent, says other people are gaslighting him, and states that they are making him believe he committed grooming when he did not.

File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Swears-Lucas-Did-Not-Groom-Her.jpg

Admin — Sun, 12 Jul 2026 23:45:15 GMT

Admin uploaded File:2019-01-07-Sarah-Swears-Lucas-Did-Not-Groom-Her.jpg

New page

Screenshot of a January 7, 2019 text message in which Sarah tells Lucas, “I swear on my grandmother you did not groom me,” and then makes a joke about swearing on her mother.